SCHEMBL1941978

SCHEMBL1941978

CC(C)(C)N1CCN(Cc2c(C(=O)N[C@H](c3cccc(F)c3)C3CC3)c3cccc(F)c3c(=O)n2-c2cccnc2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.41

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TACR3 P29371 11/20 0.41
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.34
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.34
THRB P10828 1/20 0.34
KLKB1 P03952 1/20 0.33
TACR2 P21452 1/20 0.33
AKT1 P31749 2/20 0.32
WDR5 P61964 2/20 0.32
ACKR3 P25106 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1717589 0.92 TACR3 (0.45) TACR3CYP2C9TACR2
SCHEMBL1942029 0.86 TACR3 (0.46) TACR3CYP2C9
SCHEMBL1550860 0.85 TACR3 (0.42) TACR3CYP2C9WDR5
SCHEMBL1717704 0.85 TACR3 (0.44) TACR3CYP2C9
SCHEMBL1942968 0.84 CYP2C9 (0.49) TACR3CYP2C9
SCHEMBL2154007 0.84 CYP2C9 (0.41) TACR3CYP2C9LMNAMAPTTACR2
SCHEMBL1550220 0.81 TACR2 (0.39) TACR3TACR2
SCHEMBL1718129 0.81 TACR3 (0.47) TACR3CYP2C9TACR2
SCHEMBL1941970 0.81 CYP2C9 (0.46) TACR3CYP2C9
SCHEMBL1366048 0.80 CYP2C9 (0.38) TACR3CYP2C9TACR2WDR5

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110130407-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2011-06-02 US claimed
US-8415356-B2 Isoquinolinone derivatives as NK3 antagonists H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2013-04-09 US disclosed
US-8415356-B2 Isoquinolinone derivatives as NK3 antagonists H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2013-04-09 US disclosed
US-20110130407-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2011-06-02 US disclosed
US-20110130407-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2011-06-02 US disclosed
US-20110130407-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2011-06-02 US disclosed
WO-2009156339-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2009-12-30 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110130407-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS KCNQ3, KCNK3, GRIK3 TACR3 30/4885CYP2C9 2734/4885LMNA 4214/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.