SCHEMBL19726142

SCHEMBL19726142

CC(=O)NC1[C@H](OCCN)OC(CO)[C@@H](O[C@@H]2OC(CO)[C@@H](O[C@@H]3OC(CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)C3O)[C@@H](O)C2NC(C)=O)[C@@H]1O

nearest known ligand 0.73

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LGALS3 P17931 7/20 0.73
LGALS8 O00214 2/20 0.73
LGALS4 P56470 2/20 0.73
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.56
IGF2R P11717 2/20 0.56
CD69 Q07108 1/20 0.51
CHIA Q9BZP6 1/20 0.50
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.47
THRB P10828 1/20 0.47
LGALS1 P09382 1/20 0.47
LGALS7; LGALS7B P47929 1/20 0.47
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.46
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.46
LGALS9 O00182 1/20 0.46
HPSE Q9Y251 2/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL19726163 0.94 LGALS3 (0.66) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4MAPK1IGF2R
SCHEMBL19726152 0.94 LGALS3 (0.66) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4MAPK1IGF2R
SCHEMBL19726147 0.92 LGALS3 (0.64) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4MAPK1IGF2R
SCHEMBL17468115 0.90 MAPK1 (0.63) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4MAPK1IGF2R
SCHEMBL19726162 0.90 LGALS3 (0.61) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4MAPK1IGF2R
SCHEMBL19367491 0.90 LGALS3 (0.74) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4MAPK1IGF2R
SCHEMBL21258434 0.90 LGALS3 (0.74) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4MAPK1IGF2R
SCHEMBL21258435 0.90 LGALS3 (0.74) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4MAPK1IGF2R
SCHEMBL21852877 0.90 LGALS3 (0.74) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4MAPK1IGF2R
SCHEMBL19197226 0.90 LGALS3 (0.74) LGALS3LGALS8LGALS4MAPK1IGF2R

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20170362265-A1 METHODS FOR MODULAR SYNTHESIS OF N-GLYCANS AND ARRAYS THEREOF ACADEMIA SINICA (TW) 2017-12-21 US disclosed
US-20170362265-A1 METHODS FOR MODULAR SYNTHESIS OF N-GLYCANS AND ARRAYS THEREOF ACADEMIA SINICA (TW) 2017-12-21 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20170362265-A1 METHODS FOR MODULAR SYNTHESIS OF N-GLYCANS AND ARRAYS THEREOF SIGLEC7, SIGLEC9, CD4 LGALS3 52/4885LGALS8 49/4885LGALS4 37/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.