SCHEMBL19862277

SCHEMBL19862277

C1=Cc2ccc(-c3nc4ccccc4n3-c3ccccc3)cc2C2(c3ccccc31)c1ccccc1-c1c2ccc2sc3ccccc3c12

nearest known ligand 0.33

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.33
HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.33
HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.33
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.33
ESR1 P03372 1/20 0.33
ESR2 Q92731 1/20 0.33
PTGER4 P35408 1/20 0.32
GRIA1 P42261 1/20 0.31
CACNG8 Q8WXS5 1/20 0.31
CACNG2 Q9Y698 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL19862276 0.92 SIRT2 (0.33) ESR1ESR2PTGER4
SCHEMBL20224516 0.90 RECQL (0.35) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6RECQLESR1
SCHEMBL19862186 0.89 RECQL (0.33) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6RECQLESR1
SCHEMBL19869420 0.86 RECQL (0.37) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6RECQLESR1
SCHEMBL19862233 0.85 RECQL (0.34) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6RECQLESR1
SCHEMBL19862253 0.85 RECQL (0.34) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6RECQLESR1
SCHEMBL20224515 0.82 SIRT2 (0.33) ESR1ESR2PTGER4
SCHEMBL19862339 0.82
SCHEMBL19862338 0.81
SCHEMBL19862336 0.81

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10454039-B2 Compound and organic electronic device using the same SHANGHAI NICHEM FINE CHEMICAL CO., LTD. (CN) 2019-10-22 US disclosed
US-20180047918-A1 COMPOUND AND ORGANIC ELECTRONIC DEVICE USING THE SAME NICHEM FINE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (TW) 2018-02-15 US disclosed
US-20180047918-A1 COMPOUND AND ORGANIC ELECTRONIC DEVICE USING THE SAME NICHEM FINE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (TW) 2018-02-15 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20180047918-A1 COMPOUND AND ORGANIC ELECTRONIC DEVICE USING THE SAME ORC3, AOX1, RCOR3 HDAC1 2272/4885HDAC8 3113/4885HDAC6 4582/4885
US-10454039-B2 Compound and organic electronic device using the same ORC3, AOX1, RCOR3 HDAC1 2272/4885HDAC8 3113/4885HDAC6 4582/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.