SCHEMBL20022537

SCHEMBL20022537

CCC(C)Oc1cc2nccc(Oc3ccc(NC(=O)c4c(OCC(F)(F)F)cnn4-c4cnc(N)nc4)nc3)c2cc1OC

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 8)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MET P08581 17/20 0.48
CSF1R P07333 1/20 0.46
EIF2AK3 Q9NZJ5 1/20 0.46
EIF2AK4 Q9P2K8 1/20 0.46
IGF1R P08069 1/20 0.45
KDR P35968 1/20 0.45
PTK2 Q05397 1/20 0.45
PTK2B Q14289 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20022554 0.94 MET (0.50) METCSF1REIF2AK3EIF2AK4IGF1R
SCHEMBL20022534 0.87 MET (0.52) METCSF1REIF2AK3EIF2AK4IGF1R
SCHEMBL20022543 0.84 MET (0.57) METIGF1RKDRPTK2PTK2B
SCHEMBL20022457 0.83 MET (0.56) METEIF2AK3EIF2AK4IGF1RKDR
SCHEMBL18163439 0.81 MET (0.55) METEIF2AK3EIF2AK4IGF1RKDR
SCHEMBL20022553 0.81 MET (0.54) METCSF1REIF2AK3EIF2AK4IGF1R
SCHEMBL20022536 0.79 MET (0.56) METCSF1RIGF1RKDRPTK2
SCHEMBL20022533 0.79 MET (0.52) METCSF1REIF2AK3EIF2AK4IGF1R
SCHEMBL18163400 0.78 MET (0.56) METEIF2AK3EIF2AK4IGF1RKDR
SCHEMBL20022531 0.78 MET (0.52) METKDR

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10934274-B2 Quinoline derivatives as TAM RTK inhibitors QURIENT CO., LTD. (KR) 2021-03-02 US disclosed
US-20180093968-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS TAM RTK INHIBITORS LEAD DISCOVERY CENTER GMBH (DE) 2018-04-05 US disclosed
US-20180093968-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS TAM RTK INHIBITORS LEAD DISCOVERY CENTER GMBH (DE) 2018-04-05 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-10934274-B2 Quinoline derivatives as TAM RTK inhibitors TYRO3, MERTK, AXL MET 5/4885CSF1R 23/4885EIF2AK3 2931/4885
US-20180093968-A1 QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS TAM RTK INHIBITORS TYRO3, MERTK, AXL MET 5/4885CSF1R 23/4885EIF2AK3 2931/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.