SCHEMBL2015469

SCHEMBL2015469

CC(C)c1ccc(NC(=O)CC2C(=O)OC(C)(C)CN2Cc2ccccc2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.47
MAPT P10636 6/20 0.45
BCHE P06276 4/20 0.45
THRB P10828 2/20 0.45
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.45
POLB P06746 2/20 0.44
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.43
PKM P14618 1/20 0.43
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.41
FAAH O00519 1/20 0.41
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.41
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2011806 0.87 MAPT (0.53) RAB9AMAPTTHRBTP53POLB
SCHEMBL2013171 0.85 MAPT (0.47) RAB9AMAPTTHRBTP53POLB
SCHEMBL2015937 0.84 MAPT (0.44) RAB9AMAPTTHRBTP53POLB
SCHEMBL2013756 0.84 MAPT (0.46) RAB9AMAPTTHRBTP53POLB
SCHEMBL2016591 0.83 MAPT (0.43) RAB9AMAPTTHRBTP53POLB
SCHEMBL2015104 0.83 MAPT (0.45) RAB9AMAPTTHRBTP53POLB
SCHEMBL2016483 0.82 MAPT (0.44) RAB9AMAPTTHRBTP53POLB
SCHEMBL2012897 0.81 MAPT (0.44) RAB9AMAPTTHRBTP53POLB
SCHEMBL2013075 0.80 MAPT (0.43) RAB9AMAPTTHRBTP53POLB
SCHEMBL2016452 0.80 MAPT (0.46) RAB9AMAPTTHRBTP53POLB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2513069-B1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS UNIV LEUVEN KATH (BE) 2014-10-15 EP claimed
EP-2513069-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (BE) 2012-10-24 EP claimed
US-20120252801-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN, K.U.LEUVEN R&D (BE) 2012-10-04 US claimed
WO-2011072345-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN (BE) 2011-06-23 WO claimed
EP-2513069-B1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS UNIV LEUVEN KATH (BE) 2014-10-15 EP disclosed
EP-2513069-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (BE) 2012-10-24 EP disclosed
US-20120252801-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN, K.U.LEUVEN R&D (BE) 2012-10-04 US disclosed
US-20120252801-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN, K.U.LEUVEN R&D (BE) 2012-10-04 US disclosed
WO-2011072345-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN (BE) 2011-06-23 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120252801-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS ERG28, DPM1, CYP51A1 RAB9A 2827/4885MAPT 809/4885BCHE 3260/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.