SCHEMBL20199608

SCHEMBL20199608

c1ccc(-n2c3cc4c(cc3c3ccc5ccccc5c32)C2(c3ccccc3-c3ccccc32)c2ccccc2C42c3ccccc3-c3ccccc32)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.32

Predicted protein targets (top 8)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.32
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.32
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.32
SIRT2 Q8IXJ6 1/20 0.31
SIRT1 Q96EB6 1/20 0.31
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.31
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.31
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20199647 0.94 SIRT2 (0.33) KDM4EATML3MBTL1SIRT2SIRT1
SCHEMBL20199718 0.94 KDM4E (0.31) KDM4EATML3MBTL1SIRT2SIRT1
SCHEMBL19636193 0.93 SIRT2 (0.33) KDM4EATML3MBTL1SIRT2SIRT1
SCHEMBL20203684 0.91 KDM4E (0.31) KDM4EATML3MBTL1SIRT2SIRT1
SCHEMBL20199614 0.91 KDM4E (0.38) KDM4EATML3MBTL1
SCHEMBL20199612 0.90
SCHEMBL20199651 0.87 PDE6D (0.30)
SCHEMBL20199723 0.87 PDE6D (0.30)
SCHEMBL20199738 0.87 KDM4E (0.38) KDM4EATML3MBTL1
SCHEMBL20199671 0.87 KDM4E (0.38) KDM4EATML3MBTL1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11001752-B2 Double spiro organic compound and organic electronic element comprising same LG CHEM, LTD. (KR) 2021-05-11 US disclosed
US-20180148640-A1 DOUBLE SPIRO ORGANIC COMPOUND AND ORGANIC ELECTRONIC ELEMENT COMPRISING SAME LG CHEM, LTD. (KR) 2018-05-31 US disclosed
US-20180148640-A1 DOUBLE SPIRO ORGANIC COMPOUND AND ORGANIC ELECTRONIC ELEMENT COMPRISING SAME LG CHEM, LTD. (KR) 2018-05-31 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-11001752-B2 Double spiro organic compound and organic electronic element comprising same DCX, TERT, TELO2 KDM4E 1392/4885ATM 849/4885L3MBTL1 966/4885
US-20180148640-A1 DOUBLE SPIRO ORGANIC COMPOUND AND ORGANIC ELECTRONIC ELEMENT COMPRISING SAME DCX, TERT, TELO2 KDM4E 1392/4885ATM 849/4885L3MBTL1 966/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.