SCHEMBL20655313

SCHEMBL20655313

CCCCCCC/C=C(\C)C(C)N

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
EP300 Q09472 1/20 0.44
SPHK1 Q9NYA1 3/20 0.41
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.41
TP53 P04637 3/20 0.41
GMNN O75496 2/20 0.41
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.41
GLA P06280 2/20 0.41
POLB P06746 2/20 0.41
THRB P10828 2/20 0.41
CETP P11597 2/20 0.41
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.41
CXCR5 P32302 2/20 0.41
CCR6 P51684 2/20 0.41
BLM P54132 2/20 0.41
UBE2N P61088 2/20 0.41
SPHK2 Q9NRA0 2/20 0.41
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.41
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL23448634 0.91 GRIK1 (0.42) EP300SPHK1MEN1KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL11973145 0.83 EP300 (0.47) EP300MEN1KMT2AMAPTGMNN
SCHEMBL11973141 0.83 EP300 (0.47) EP300MEN1KMT2AMAPTGMNN
SCHEMBL11973124 0.83 EP300 (0.47) EP300MEN1KMT2AMAPTGMNN
SCHEMBL11973121 0.83 EP300 (0.47) EP300MEN1KMT2AMAPTGMNN
SCHEMBL11973094 0.81 EP300 (0.45) EP300MEN1KMT2AMAPTGMNN
SCHEMBL11973098 0.81 EP300 (0.45) EP300MEN1KMT2AMAPTGMNN
SCHEMBL11973439 0.80 EP300 (0.43) EP300MEN1KMT2AMAPTGMNN
SCHEMBL11973443 0.80 EP300 (0.43) EP300MEN1KMT2AMAPTGMNN
SCHEMBL19093966 0.80 MAPT (0.46) EP300SPHK1MEN1KMT2AMAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20190016703-A1 BIFUNCTIONAL COMPOUNDS FOR HER3 DEGRADATION AND METHODS OF USE DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC. 2019-01-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20190016703-A1 BIFUNCTIONAL COMPOUNDS FOR HER3 DEGRADATION AND METHODS OF USE MDM2, ERBB2, ITCH EP300 1927/4885SPHK1 4415/4885MEN1 1302/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.