SCHEMBL21128352

SCHEMBL21128352

CC(=O)OC1C(OC2C(COCc3ccccc3)OC(O)C(Nc3ccccc3)C2OCc2ccccc2)OC(COCc2ccccc2)C(OCc2ccccc2)C1OCc1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ PTPN1 P18031 9/20 0.45
▸ NT5E P21589 1/20 0.45
▸ PTPN2 P17706 4/20 0.44
▸ PTPN11 Q06124 3/20 0.44
▸ CDC25B P30305 5/20 0.42
▸ GJB2 P29033 2/20 0.42
▸ PTPN6 P29350 2/20 0.41
▸ LMNA P02545 2/20 0.41
▸ KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.40
▸ TP53 P04637 1/20 0.40
▸ MDM2 Q00987 1/20 0.40
▸ SSTR1 P30872 1/20 0.40
▸ SSTR2 P30874 1/20 0.40
▸ SSTR4 P31391 1/20 0.40
▸ SSTR3 P32745 1/20 0.40
▸ SSTR5 P35346 1/20 0.40
▸ BCHE P06276 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9009910 0.88 NT5E (0.51) PTPN1NT5EPTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL8055010 0.88 NT5E (0.51) PTPN1NT5EPTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL8055015 0.88 NT5E (0.51) PTPN1NT5EPTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL19731881 0.86 PTPN1 (0.40) PTPN1NT5EPTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL19731818 0.85 NT5E (0.44) PTPN1NT5EPTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL12099744 0.84 NT5E (0.49) PTPN1NT5EPTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL25913950 0.84 LMNA (0.54) PTPN1NT5EPTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL22677699 0.83 SSTR1 (0.57) PTPN1NT5EPTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL22678415 0.83 SSTR1 (0.57) PTPN1NT5EPTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL22677692 0.83 SSTR1 (0.57) PTPN1NT5EPTPN2PTPN11CDC25B

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10336784-B2 Methods for modular synthesis of N-glycans and arrays thereof ACADEMIA SINICA (TW) 2019-07-02 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-10336784-B2 Methods for modular synthesis of N-glycans and arrays thereof SIGLEC7, SIGLEC9, CD4 PTPN1 185/4885NT5E 314/4885PTPN2 210/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback