SCHEMBL21958166

SCHEMBL21958166

C=CC(=O)N1CC[C@H](Nc2cncc(C(F)(F)F)c2)C1

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 4)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ EGFR P00533 10/20 0.55
▸ TEAD1 P28347 7/20 0.55
▸ BTK Q06187 10/20 0.52
▸ JAK3 P52333 2/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL21958764 1.00 EGFR (0.55) EGFRTEAD1BTKJAK3
SCHEMBL21958157 0.87 TEAD1 (0.60) EGFRTEAD1BTKJAK3
SCHEMBL21958183 0.87 TEAD1 (0.60) EGFRTEAD1BTKJAK3
SCHEMBL24780719 0.83 TEAD1 (0.71) EGFRTEAD1BTK
SCHEMBL21958163 0.83 TEAD1 (0.71) EGFRTEAD1BTK
SCHEMBL21957254 0.83 TEAD1 (0.71) EGFRTEAD1BTK
SCHEMBL21958158 0.82 TEAD1 (0.55) EGFRTEAD1BTK
SCHEMBL21958755 0.82 TEAD1 (0.55) EGFRTEAD1BTK
SCHEMBL25785369 0.82 TEAD1 (0.55) EGFRTEAD1BTKJAK3
SCHEMBL21958156 0.79 TEAD1 (0.53) EGFRTEAD1BTK

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230192607-A1 TRANSCRIPTIONAL ENHANCED ASSOCIATE DOMAIN (TEAD) TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC. (US) 2023-06-22 — — US disclosed
US-20220402869-A1 TRANSCRIPTIONAL ENHANCED ASSOCIATE DOMAIN (TEAD) TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC. (US) 2022-12-22 — — US disclosed
WO-2020081572-A1 TRANSCRIPTIONAL ENHANCED ASSOCIATE DOMAIN (TEAD) TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC. (US) 2020-04-23 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230192607-A1 TRANSCRIPTIONAL ENHANCED ASSOCIATE DOMAIN (TEAD) TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF TEAD1, TEAD4, TEAD2 EGFR 3966/4885TEAD1 1/4885BTK 4883/4885
US-20220402869-A1 TRANSCRIPTIONAL ENHANCED ASSOCIATE DOMAIN (TEAD) TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF TEAD1, TEAD4, TEAD2 EGFR 2755/4885TEAD1 1/4885BTK 4874/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback