SCHEMBL22017469

SCHEMBL22017469

C=C(C)C(=O)Oc1cc(OCCCC)ccc1-c1nc(-c2ccc(OCCCC)cc2OCCCC)nc(-c2ccc(OCCCC)cc2OC(=O)C(=C)C)n1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
POLB P06746 1/20 0.41
APEX1 P27695 1/20 0.41
HTT P42858 1/20 0.41
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.41
PTPN11 Q06124 3/20 0.40
NPC1 O15118 3/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.40
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.40
GAA P10253 1/20 0.40
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.40
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.40
GCGR P47871 1/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.39
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.39
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.39
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.39
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.39
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL24089218 0.95 MAPT (0.43) POLBAPEX1HTTTDP1MAPT
SCHEMBL24089226 0.93 MAPT (0.44) POLBAPEX1HTTTDP1MAPT
SCHEMBL19484788 0.89 MAPT (0.43) MAPTKMT2APTPN11NPC1MEN1
SCHEMBL22017309 0.84 THRB (0.46) MAPTKMT2APTPN11NPC1MEN1
SCHEMBL17625855 0.84 KMT2A (0.40) POLBAPEX1HTTTDP1MAPT
SCHEMBL24089220 0.81 POLB (0.38) POLBAPEX1HTTTDP1MAPT
SCHEMBL24089221 0.81 THRB (0.43) MAPTKMT2APTPN11NPC1MEN1
SCHEMBL195418 0.80 NPC1 (0.50) HTTTDP1MAPTKMT2APTPN11
SCHEMBL996673 0.80 NPC1 (0.50) HTTTDP1MAPTKMT2APTPN11
SCHEMBL30771495 0.80 NPC1 (0.50) HTTTDP1MAPTKMT2APTPN11

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20200157060-A1 FILM FORMING MATERIAL, COMPOSITION FOR FILM FORMATION FOR LITHOGRAPHY, MATERIAL FOR OPTICAL COMPONENT FORMATION, RESIST COMPOSITION, RESIST PATTERN FORMATION METHOD, PERMANENT FILM FOR RESIST, RADIATION-SENSITIVE COMPOSITION, METHOD FOR PRODUCING AMORPHOUS FILM, UNDERLAYER FILM FORMING MATERIAL FOR LITHOGRAPHY, COMPOSITION FOR UNDERLAYER FILM FORMATION FOR LITHOGRAPHY, METHOD FOR PRODUCING UNDERLAYER FILM FOR LITHOGRAPHY, AND CIRCUIT PATTERN FORMATION METHOD MITSUBISHI GAS CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. (JP) 2020-05-21 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20200157060-A1 FILM FORMING MATERIAL, COMPOSITION FOR FILM FORMATION FOR LITHOGRAPHY, MATERIAL FOR OPTICAL COMPONENT FORMATION, RESIST COMPOSITION, RESIST PATTERN FORMATION METHOD, PERMANENT FILM FOR RESIST, RADIATION-SENSITIVE COMPOSITION, METHOD FOR PRODUCING AMORPHOUS FILM, UNDERLAYER FILM FORMING MATERIAL FOR LITHOGRAPHY, COMPOSITION FOR UNDERLAYER FILM FORMATION FOR LITHOGRAPHY, METHOD FOR PRODUCING UNDERLAYER FILM FOR LITHOGRAPHY, AND CIRCUIT PATTERN FORMATION METHOD RAD51, C5, UBE2G2 POLB 2651/4885APEX1 124/4885HTT 4367/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.