SCHEMBL22828633

SCHEMBL22828633

O=c1c(Nc2ccc(C(F)(F)F)cc2)c(Nc2c[nH]c3ccccc23)c1=O

nearest known ligand 0.60

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
STING1 Q86WV6 6/20 0.60
GOT1 P17174 1/20 0.46
TRPV1 Q8NER1 2/20 0.43
IGF1R P08069 1/20 0.43
MET P08581 1/20 0.43
SRC P12931 1/20 0.43
PRKCB P05771 1/20 0.42
PTGS2 P35354 1/20 0.42
CFTR P13569 1/20 0.41
AURKA O14965 1/20 0.40
AURKB Q96GD4 1/20 0.40
HDAC1 Q13547 2/20 0.40
HDAC3 O15379 1/20 0.40
HDAC4 P56524 1/20 0.40
HDAC7 Q8WUI4 1/20 0.40
HDAC2 Q92769 1/20 0.40
HDAC10 Q969S8 1/20 0.40
HDAC11 Q96DB2 1/20 0.40
HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.40
HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL22699913 0.88 STING1 (0.46) STING1PRKCBAURKBHDAC1HDAC3
SCHEMBL31744663 0.88 STING1 (0.67) STING1GOT1TRPV1IGF1RMET
SCHEMBL22700027 0.83 CNR1 (0.49) STING1HDAC1HDAC3HDAC4HDAC7
SCHEMBL22700033 0.82 STING1 (0.41) STING1AURKBHDAC1HDAC3HDAC4
SCHEMBL25120717 0.82 STING1 (0.43) STING1TRPV1
SCHEMBL25120783 0.82 SNCA (0.43) STING1GOT1AURKBHDAC1
SCHEMBL25120782 0.80 STING1 (0.60) STING1CFTR
SCHEMBL22700056 0.78 STING1 (0.41) STING1PTGS2CFTR
SCHEMBL22828628 0.78 HDAC1 (0.38) STING1AURKBHDAC1HDAC3HDAC4
SCHEMBL22700029 0.76 STING1 (0.59) STING1GOT1TRPV1IGF1RMET

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230106899-A1 METHODS OF TREATING CANCER NOVARTIS PHARMA AG (CH) 2023-04-06 US disclosed
WO-2022140387-A1 METHODS OF TREATING CANCER IFM DUE, INC. (US) 2022-06-30 WO disclosed
WO-2022140397-A1 METHODS OF TREATING CANCER IFM DUE, INC. (US) 2022-06-30 WO disclosed
WO-2022140410-A1 METHODS OF TREATING CANCER IFM DUE, INC. (US) 2022-06-30 WO disclosed
WO-2022140403-A1 METHODS OF TREATING CANCER IFM DUE, INC. (US) 2022-06-30 WO disclosed
WO-2020257621-A1 METHODS OF TREATING CANCER IFM DUE, INC. (US) 2020-12-24 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230106899-A1 METHODS OF TREATING CANCER STING1, CGAS, TBK1 STING1 1/4885GOT1 176/4885TRPV1 2675/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.