SCHEMBL23269324

SCHEMBL23269324

Cn1cc(C(=O)N[C@H](C=O)CCc2ccccc2)c(-c2ccccc2)n1

nearest known ligand 0.50

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ DCAF1 Q9Y4B6 1/20 0.50
▸ POLB P06746 2/20 0.46
▸ CAPN1 P07384 3/20 0.46
▸ ACE P12821 1/20 0.44
▸ CTSK P43235 2/20 0.42
▸ CTSL P07711 1/20 0.42
▸ MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.42
▸ HTT P42858 1/20 0.42
▸ KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.42
▸ SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.42
▸ HPGD P15428 1/20 0.42
▸ KLKB1 P03952 1/20 0.42
▸ KLK1 P06870 1/20 0.42
▸ TP53 P04637 2/20 0.41
▸ USP2 O75604 1/20 0.41
▸ TSHR P16473 1/20 0.41
▸ ATM Q13315 1/20 0.41
▸ MAPT P10636 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20027730 0.90 CAPN1 (0.55) DCAF1CAPN1CTSKCTSL
SCHEMBL20027878 0.90 CAPN1 (0.55) DCAF1CAPN1CTSKCTSL
SCHEMBL20028241 0.84 DCAF1 (0.50) DCAF1CAPN1CTSKCTSLKMT2A
SCHEMBL20027909 0.82 DCAF1 (0.53) DCAF1POLBCAPN1CTSKCTSL
SCHEMBL21854195 0.81 CAPN1 (0.48) DCAF1CAPN1CTSKCTSLMAPT
SCHEMBL20027846 0.81 CAPN1 (0.48) DCAF1CAPN1CTSKCTSLMAPT
SCHEMBL20028183 0.80 CAPN1 (0.47) DCAF1CAPN1CTSKCTSLKMT2A
SCHEMBL20027852 0.80 CAPN1 (0.47) DCAF1CAPN1CTSKCTSLKMT2A
SCHEMBL22897244 0.80 DCAF1 (0.46) DCAF1POLBCTSKCTSLMEN1
SCHEMBL24862949 0.77 CAPN1 (0.59) POLBCAPN1ACECTSKMEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20210113560-A1 METHOD OF TREATING FIBROTIC DISEASE BLADE THERAPEUTICS INC (US) 2021-04-22 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20210113560-A1 METHOD OF TREATING FIBROTIC DISEASE CAPN9, CAPNS1, CAPN1 DCAF1 2787/4885POLB 1986/4885CAPN1 3/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback