SCHEMBL24047741

SCHEMBL24047741

CCOC(=O)/C=C(\O)c1c(F)cccc1F

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.44
NLRP3 Q96P20 1/20 0.42
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.42
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.42
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.42
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.42
CA9 Q16790 1/20 0.42
CA14 Q9ULX7 1/20 0.42
CES2 O00748 1/20 0.41
CES1 P23141 1/20 0.41
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.41
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.40
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.40
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.40
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.40
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.40
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.40
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.39
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL25674225 0.90 SMN1; SMN2 (0.40) SMN1; SMN2NLRP3CA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL9380087 0.83 SMN1; SMN2 (0.43) SMN1; SMN2NLRP3CA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL9380090 0.83 SMN1; SMN2 (0.43) SMN1; SMN2NLRP3CA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL8005742 0.81 NPSR1 (0.46) SMN1; SMN2NLRP3CA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL12599765 0.81 SMN1; SMN2 (0.43) SMN1; SMN2NLRP3CA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL22886614 0.78 SMN1; SMN2 (0.43) SMN1; SMN2NLRP3CA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL14186862 0.76 MAPT (0.53) SMN1; SMN2CA12CA1CA2CA9
SCHEMBL1996045 0.75 CA12 (0.66) NLRP3CA12CA1CA2CA7
SCHEMBL1067165 0.75 SMN1; SMN2 (0.43) SMN1; SMN2NLRP3CA12CA1CA2
SCHEMBL1067166 0.75 SMN1; SMN2 (0.43) SMN1; SMN2NLRP3CA12CA1CA2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230303498-A1 HERBICIDAL CINNOLINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG (CH) 2023-09-28 US disclosed
US-20230303498-A1 HERBICIDAL CINNOLINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG (CH) 2023-09-28 US disclosed
US-20230250066-A1 HERBICIDAL CINNOLINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG (CH) 2023-08-10 US disclosed
US-20230250066-A1 HERBICIDAL CINNOLINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG (CH) 2023-08-10 US disclosed
WO-2021233787-A1 HERBICIDAL CINNOLINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG (CH) 2021-11-25 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230303498-A1 HERBICIDAL CINNOLINE DERIVATIVES DDT, DERL1, MTX1 SMN1; SMN2 4034/4885NLRP3 4624/4885CA12 1113/4885
US-20230250066-A1 HERBICIDAL CINNOLINE DERIVATIVES DDT, CYP1B1, DERL1 SMN1; SMN2 4042/4885NLRP3 4631/4885CA12 1086/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.