SCHEMBL2471097

SCHEMBL2471097

CCNS(=O)(=O)NCc1ccc(Nc2nc(Nc3ccc(S(N)(=O)=O)cc3)ncc2C)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.56

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CDK2 P24941 5/20 0.56
CCNA2 P20248 2/20 0.56
JAK3 P52333 8/20 0.54
JAK1 P23458 7/20 0.54
PTK2 Q05397 4/20 0.50
CDK1 P06493 3/20 0.50
KDR P35968 3/20 0.50
AURKA O14965 2/20 0.50
JAK2 O60674 2/20 0.50
TYK2 P29597 2/20 0.50
FLT3 P36888 2/20 0.50
NTRK1 P04629 2/20 0.50
SYK P43405 2/20 0.50
CDC7 O00311 1/20 0.50
PLK4 O00444 1/20 0.50
CHEK1 O14757 1/20 0.50
DCLK1 O15075 1/20 0.50
PDPK1 O15530 1/20 0.50
DAPK3 O43293 1/20 0.50
ROCK2 O75116 1/20 0.50

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4972834 0.91 JAK3 (0.56) CDK2CCNA2JAK3JAK1PTK2
SCHEMBL2474786 0.90 JAK3 (0.56) CDK2CCNA2JAK3JAK1PTK2
SCHEMBL2473715 0.90 JAK3 (0.64) CDK2CCNA2JAK3JAK1PTK2
SCHEMBL2470368 0.89 NTRK1 (0.57) CDK2CCNA2PTK2CDK1KDR
SCHEMBL4973563 0.87 CDK2 (0.53) CDK2CCNA2JAK3JAK1PTK2
SCHEMBL2470647 0.87 CDK2 (0.53) CDK2CCNA2JAK3JAK1PTK2
SCHEMBL2470403 0.86 CDK2 (0.53) CDK2CCNA2JAK3JAK1PTK2
SCHEMBL4973466 0.85 JAK3 (0.59) CDK2CCNA2JAK3JAK1PTK2
SCHEMBL4973896 0.84 JAK3 (0.51) CDK2CCNA2JAK3JAK1PTK2
SCHEMBL4975331 0.84 CA2 (0.55) CDK2CCNA2JAK3JAK1PTK2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2370415-B1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF THE JAK PATHWAY RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC (US) 2016-04-20 EP claimed
US-8268851-B2 Compositions and methods for inhibition of the JAK pathway RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2012-09-18 US claimed
EP-2370415-A2 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF THE JAK PATHWAY Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (US) 2011-10-05 EP claimed
WO-2010075558-A2 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF THE JAK PATHWAY RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2010-07-01 WO claimed
US-20100158921-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF THE JAK PATHWAY RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2010-06-24 US claimed
EP-2370415-B1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF THE JAK PATHWAY RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC (US) 2016-04-20 EP disclosed
US-8420659-B2 Compositions and methods for inhibition of the JAK pathway RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2013-04-16 US disclosed
US-20120301486-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF THE JAK PATHWAY Riger Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2012-11-29 US disclosed
US-8268851-B2 Compositions and methods for inhibition of the JAK pathway RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2012-09-18 US disclosed
US-20100158921-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF THE JAK PATHWAY RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2010-06-24 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100158921-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF THE JAK PATHWAY JAK3, JAK2, JAK1 CDK2 236/4885CCNA2 1836/4885JAK3 1/4885
US-20120301486-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF THE JAK PATHWAY JAK3, JAK2, JAK1 CDK2 236/4885CCNA2 1836/4885JAK3 1/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.