Bimosiamose

Bimosiamose

SCHEMBL2528669

O.O=C(O)Cc1cccc(-c2cc(CCCCCCc3ccc(O[C@@H]4O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]4O)c(-c4cccc(CC(=O)O)c4)c3)ccc2O[C@@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]2O)c1

nearest known ligand 0.98

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

SELESELLSELP

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Bimosiamose. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SELP known ✓ P16109 2/20 0.98
SELPLG Q14242 1/20 0.98
PPARG P37231 2/20 0.53
PPARD Q03181 2/20 0.53
PPARA Q07869 2/20 0.53
SLC28A3 Q9HAS3 2/20 0.46
SLC5A2 P31639 1/20 0.44
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.44
SLC5A1 P13866 1/20 0.44
DYRK1A Q13627 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Bimosiamose SCHEMBL29372538 0.99 SELP (1.00) SELPSELPLGPPARGPPARDPPARA
Bimosiamose SCHEMBL14015902 0.99 SELP (1.00) SELPSELPLGPPARGPPARDPPARA
Bimosiamose SCHEMBL12182030 0.99 SELP (1.00) SELPSELPLGPPARGPPARDPPARA
Bimosiamose SCHEMBL26341832 0.99 SELP (1.00) SELPSELPLGPPARGPPARDPPARA
Bimosiamose SCHEMBL29367817 0.99 SELP (1.00) SELPSELPLGPPARGPPARDPPARA
SCHEMBL7614341 0.99 SELP (1.00) SELPSELPLGPPARGPPARDPPARA
Bimosiamose SCHEMBL2529148 0.99 SELP (1.00) SELPSELPLGPPARGPPARDPPARA
SCHEMBL7620761 0.99 SELP (1.00) SELPSELPLGPPARGPPARDPPARA
Bimosiamose SCHEMBL14970212 0.99 SELP (1.00) SELPSELPLGPPARGPPARDPPARA
SCHEMBL8205205 0.98 SELP (0.98) SELPSELPLGPPARGPPARDPPARA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110257114-A1 CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF 1,6-BIS [3-(3-CARBOXYMETHYLPHENYL)-4-(2-ALPHA-D-MANNOPYRANOSYL-OXY)-PHENYL] HEXANE REVOTAR BIOPHARMACEUTICALS AG (DE) 2011-10-20 US claimed
US-8039601-B1 Crystalline forms of 1,6-Bis [3-(3-carboxymethylphenyl)-4-(2-α-D-mannopyranosyloxy)-phenyl] hexane REVOTAR BIOPHARMACEUTICALS AG (DE) 2011-10-18 US claimed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110257114-A1 CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF 1,6-BIS [3-(3-CARBOXYMETHYLPHENYL)-4-(2-ALPHA-D-MANNOPYRANOSYL-OXY)-PHENYL] HEXANE DPM1, ALG1, CHIT1 SELP 562/4885SELPLG 779/4885PPARG 2057/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.