SCHEMBL25868486

SCHEMBL25868486

CCCOCC(COCCC(=O)OC)(COCCC(=O)OC)NC(=O)CC

nearest known ligand 0.36

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TSHR P16473 3/20 0.36
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.33
POLB P06746 1/20 0.31
POLA1 P09884 1/20 0.31
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.31
CA14 Q9ULX7 1/20 0.31
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.31
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.30
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20032308 0.95 TSHR (0.40) TSHRRECQLPOLBPOLA1CA12
SCHEMBL24136313 0.89 TSHR (0.37) TSHRRECQLPOLBPOLA1CA12
SCHEMBL16185653 0.88 GAA (0.37) TSHRRECQLPOLBMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL26700394 0.87 TSHR (0.33) TSHRRECQL
SCHEMBL16902773 0.83 HRH3 (0.42) TSHRRECQLPOLBPOLA1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL14190511 0.83 HRH3 (0.39) TSHRRECQLPOLBPOLA1CA12
SCHEMBL16185762 0.83 GAA (0.40) POLBALDH1A1KMT2A
SCHEMBL26431008 0.80 TSHR (0.35) TSHRRECQLPOLBALDH1A1
SCHEMBL20429066 0.80 TSHR (0.44) TSHRRECQLPOLBPOLA1CA12
SCHEMBL445490 0.77 TSHR (0.55) TSHRRECQLPOLBPOLA1CA12

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11767301-B2 Bi-functional molecules to degrade circulating proteins YALE UNIVERSITY (US) 2023-09-26 US disclosed
US-20230271994-A1 MOLECULAR DEGRADERS OF EXTRACELLULAR PROTEINS UNIV YALE (US) 2023-08-31 US disclosed
US-20230233689-A1 Bifunctional Small Molecules to Target the Selective Degradation of Circulating Proteins UNIV YALE (US) 2023-07-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230271994-A1 MOLECULAR DEGRADERS OF EXTRACELLULAR PROTEINS ASGR1, MSR1, LDLR TSHR 478/4885RECQL 3851/4885POLB 3511/4885
US-11767301-B2 Bi-functional molecules to degrade circulating proteins MIF, ASGR1, FCGR2A TSHR 943/4885RECQL 3219/4885POLB 4254/4885
US-20230233689-A1 Bifunctional Small Molecules to Target the Selective Degradation of Circulating Proteins ASGR1, LDLR, FCGR2A TSHR 665/4885RECQL 4311/4885POLB 4149/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.