SCHEMBL25935869

SCHEMBL25935869

CNCC1CCN(C(=O)COc2ccc(Cl)cc2C)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.67

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 5/20 0.67
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 5/20 0.67
TSHR P16473 3/20 0.67
HPGD P15428 3/20 0.67
GAA P10253 2/20 0.67
HTT P42858 2/20 0.67
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.67
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.67
MEN1 O00255 4/20 0.67
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.67
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.67
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.60
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.59
POLB P06746 1/20 0.56
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.56
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.52
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.52

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20989156 0.81 LMNA (0.65) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRHPGDGAA
SCHEMBL15134842 0.80 SMN1; SMN2 (0.83) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRHPGDGAA
SCHEMBL20989308 0.80 KMT2A (0.56) SMN1; SMN2HPGDMAPK1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL25935735 0.79 LMNA (0.62) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRHPGDGAA
SCHEMBL652306 0.79 SMN1; SMN2 (0.77) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRHPGDGAA
SCHEMBL15337901 0.77 SMN1; SMN2 (0.60) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRHPGDGAA
SCHEMBL10245179 0.77 SMN1; SMN2 (0.77) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRHPGDGAA
SCHEMBL25935737 0.77 SMN1; SMN2 (0.77) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRHPGDGAA
SCHEMBL5064619 0.76 LMNA (0.76) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRHPGDGAA
SCHEMBL24893071 0.75 LMNA (0.74) LMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRHPGDGAA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230242548-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING CANCER THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 2023-08-03 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230242548-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING CANCER KRAS, HRAS, NRAS LMNA 2600/4885SMN1; SMN2 3432/4885TSHR 4752/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.