SCHEMBL2608577

SCHEMBL2608577

CC1CC(N)c2ccccc2N1

nearest known ligand 0.41

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
BRD4 O60885 3/20 0.41
CREBBP Q92793 2/20 0.41
EP300 Q09472 1/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.40
HTT P42858 1/20 0.40
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.40
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.40
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.40
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.39
GFER P55789 1/20 0.39
SLC6A2 P23975 3/20 0.37
SLC6A3 Q01959 3/20 0.37
SLC6A4 P31645 2/20 0.37
KDM1A O60341 4/20 0.36
HTR5A P47898 3/20 0.36
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.36
NOS2 P35228 1/20 0.34
KDM1B Q8NB78 1/20 0.33
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2607077 1.00 BRD4 (0.41) BRD4CREBBPEP300MAPTHTT
SCHEMBL27473433 0.80 MEN1 (0.55) BRD4CREBBPEP300MAPTHTT
SCHEMBL9384154 0.80 MEN1 (0.55) BRD4CREBBPEP300MAPTHTT
SCHEMBL27473696 0.80 MEN1 (0.55) BRD4CREBBPEP300MAPTHTT
SCHEMBL30499386 0.80 MEN1 (0.55) BRD4CREBBPEP300MAPTHTT
SCHEMBL27473680 0.80 MEN1 (0.55) BRD4CREBBPEP300MAPTHTT
SCHEMBL27476976 0.80 MEN1 (0.55) BRD4CREBBPEP300MAPTHTT
SCHEMBL3458514 0.77 MAPT (0.43) BRD4CREBBPEP300MAPTHTT
SCHEMBL3458510 0.77 CREBBP (0.44) BRD4CREBBPEP300MAPTHTT
SCHEMBL18407439 0.74 AR (0.41) BRD4CREBBPEP300MAPTHTT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
CN-102491967-A Method for preparing 2-methyl-4-amido tetrahydroquinoline derivative UNIV SOOCHOW 2012-06-13 CN disclosed
CN-102491967-A Method for preparing 2-methyl-4-amido tetrahydroquinoline derivative UNIV SOOCHOW 2012-06-13 CN disclosed
EP-1730152-B1 TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND A PROCESS FOR PREPARING THE SAME MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORP (JP) 2012-05-02 EP disclosed
US-8158640-B2 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives and a process for preparing the same MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2012-04-17 US disclosed
US-20110039828-A1 TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND A PROCESS FOR PREPARING THE SAME MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2011-02-17 US disclosed
US-7872126-B2 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives and a process for preparing the same MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2011-01-18 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110039828-A1 TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND A PROCESS FOR PREPARING THE SAME CETP, MTTP, NPC1L1 BRD4 305/4885CREBBP 300/4885EP300 151/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.