SCHEMBL26328525

SCHEMBL26328525

CC(C)(C)Cc1ccc(C(C)(C)NC(C)(C)C)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ESR1 P03372 5/20 0.48
ESR2 Q92731 4/20 0.39
THRA P10827 1/20 0.38
THRB P10828 1/20 0.38
SLC6A2 P23975 2/20 0.32
HTR2A P28223 1/20 0.32
SLC6A4 P31645 1/20 0.32
HRH1 P35367 1/20 0.32
HTR2B P41595 1/20 0.32
CHRNA4 P43681 1/20 0.32
SLC6A3 Q01959 1/20 0.32
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.32
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.32
BRS3 P32247 1/20 0.32
TAAR1 Q96RJ0 1/20 0.30
EPHX2 P34913 1/20 0.30
APP P05067 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL26748609 0.81 PLK1 (0.39) LMNATAAR1
SCHEMBL6685103 0.76 ESR1 (0.74) ESR1ESR2THRATHRBSLC6A2
SCHEMBL19454941 0.75 ESR1 (0.58) ESR1ESR2THRATHRBLMNA
SCHEMBL18591715 0.73 TSHR (0.52)
SCHEMBL19464746 0.72 ESR1 (0.41) ESR1ESR2THRATHRB
SCHEMBL1691810 0.71 ESR1 (0.54) ESR1ESR2THRATHRBTAAR1
SCHEMBL19772887 0.71 ESR1 (0.54) ESR1ESR2THRATHRBSLC6A2
SCHEMBL13555478 0.71 ESR1 (0.54) ESR1ESR2THRATHRBSLC6A2
SCHEMBL8254374 0.70 KCNN4 (0.44) ESR1ESR2TAAR1
SCHEMBL11955108 0.70 ESR1 (0.58) ESR1ESR2THRATHRBSLC6A2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230357180-A1 DEGRADERS AND DEGRONS FOR TARGETED PROTEIN DEGRADATION C4 THERAPEUTICS, INC. (US) 2023-11-09 US disclosed
US-20230279023-A1 N/O-Linked Degrons and Degronimers for Protein Degradation C4 THERAPEUTICS, INC. (US) 2023-09-07 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230357180-A1 DEGRADERS AND DEGRONS FOR TARGETED PROTEIN DEGRADATION STUB1, MDM2, USP30 ESR1 1132/4885ESR2 2108/4885THRA 2185/4885
US-20230279023-A1 N/O-Linked Degrons and Degronimers for Protein Degradation CRBN, CBL, STUB1 ESR1 1237/4885ESR2 1396/4885THRA 952/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.