SCHEMBL29591585

SCHEMBL29591585

CSCC[C@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CC(=O)O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(=O)O)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)CNC(=O)CN)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.41

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ GNPAT O15228 1/20 0.41
▸ FNTA P49354 2/20 0.40
▸ FNTB P49356 2/20 0.40
▸ PGGT1B P53609 1/20 0.40
▸ LTA4H P09960 1/20 0.40
▸ BACE1 P56817 1/20 0.39
▸ MMP7 P09237 1/20 0.37
▸ CCKBR P32239 4/20 0.37
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL10523388 0.84 FNTA (0.42) GNPATFNTAFNTBPGGT1BBACE1
SCHEMBL10523396 0.84 FNTA (0.42) GNPATFNTAFNTBPGGT1BBACE1
SCHEMBL30051202 0.84 FNTA (0.45) FNTAFNTBPGGT1BLTA4HLMNA
SCHEMBL31412197 0.83 FNTA (0.41) FNTAFNTBPGGT1BBACE1CCKBR
SCHEMBL11662923 0.83 FNTA (0.49) FNTAFNTBPGGT1BLMNA
SCHEMBL11662915 0.83 FNTA (0.49) FNTAFNTBPGGT1BLMNA
SCHEMBL21261601 0.82 LTA4H (0.43) FNTAFNTBPGGT1BLTA4HBACE1
SCHEMBL21261602 0.82 LTA4H (0.43) FNTAFNTBPGGT1BLTA4HBACE1
SCHEMBL7987401 0.82 FNTA (0.48) FNTAFNTBPGGT1BLMNA
SCHEMBL7987408 0.82 FNTA (0.48) FNTAFNTBPGGT1BLMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-12618102-B2 Biochemical reaction methods and reagents comprising intrinsically disordered regions Biocrucible Limited (GB) 2026-05-05 — — US disclosed
US-20220112547-A1 BIOCHEMICAL REACTION METHODS AND REAGENTS COMPRISING INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED REGIONS Biocrucible Limited (GB) 2022-04-14 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-12618102-B2 Biochemical reaction methods and reagents comprising intrinsically disordered regions POLM, POLR1A, POLR1E GNPAT 1529/4885FNTA 1639/4885FNTB 208/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback