SCHEMBL3011304

SCHEMBL3011304

O=S(=O)(c1ccc(Br)cc1)N1CCN(c2nc(-c3cc(Cl)cc(Cl)c3)cs2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.62

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 7/20 0.62
ALDH1A1 P00352 5/20 0.62
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.62
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.53
USP2 O75604 2/20 0.53
HSD17B10 Q99714 2/20 0.53
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.53
RAB9A P51151 4/20 0.50
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.48
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.48
LMNA P02545 4/20 0.48
MAPK1 P28482 3/20 0.48
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.48
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.46
POLB P06746 2/20 0.45
PKM P14618 1/20 0.43
PTPN1 P18031 1/20 0.43
PTPN6 P29350 1/20 0.43
CDC25A P30304 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3012953 0.93 SMN1; SMN2 (0.66) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1MAPTUSP2
SCHEMBL3000822 0.92 SMN1; SMN2 (0.66) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1MAPTUSP2
SCHEMBL3008299 0.90 SMN1; SMN2 (0.70) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1MAPTUSP2
SCHEMBL3013839 0.89 SMN1; SMN2 (0.79) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1MAPTUSP2
SCHEMBL3010641 0.89 ALDH1A1 (0.62) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1MAPTUSP2
SCHEMBL3007981 0.89 SMN1; SMN2 (0.60) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1MAPTUSP2
SCHEMBL3014375 0.89 ALDH1A1 (0.53) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1MAPTUSP2
SCHEMBL2999963 0.89 SMN1; SMN2 (0.59) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1MAPTUSP2
SCHEMBL3009735 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.64) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1MAPTUSP2
SCHEMBL3017450 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.60) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1MAPTUSP2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2188272-B1 PHENYL- AND BENZYLTHIAZOLYLPIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES REMYND NV (BE) 2016-02-24 EP disclosed
US-8722681-B2 N-sulfonyl thiazolylpiperazine derivatives and related N-sulfonyl heterocyclic derivatives for the treatment of neuro degenerative diseases NV REMYND (BE) 2014-05-13 US disclosed
US-20100197703-A1 N-SULFONYL THIAZOLYLPIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND RELATED N-SULFONYL HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURO DEGENERATIVE DISEASES NV REMYND (BE) 2010-08-05 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100197703-A1 N-SULFONYL THIAZOLYLPIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND RELATED N-SULFONYL HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURO DEGENERATIVE DISEASES SMN1; SMN2, HTT, SNCA SMN1; SMN2 1/4885ALDH1A1 3510/4885L3MBTL1 1847/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.