SCHEMBL3015715

SCHEMBL3015715

CC1(Cc2cc(F)cc(F)c2)C(=O)Nc2ccc(-c3cc(C(F)(F)F)ccc3F)cc21

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.48
▸ HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.48
▸ HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.48
▸ PGR P06401 4/20 0.46
▸ PIK3CD O00329 10/20 0.42
▸ EPHX2 P34913 1/20 0.41
▸ PIK3R1 P27986 2/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3020986 0.85 PGR (0.55) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6PGRPIK3CD
SCHEMBL3023035 0.84 PGR (0.51) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6PGRPIK3CD
SCHEMBL3020049 0.80 PGR (0.55) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6PGRPIK3CD
SCHEMBL3014377 0.79 PGR (0.58) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6PGRPIK3CD
SCHEMBL2785774 0.79 HDAC1 (0.37) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6PGRPIK3CD
SCHEMBL3010046 0.77 PGR (0.68) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6PGRPIK3CD
SCHEMBL3016234 0.76 PGR (0.77) PGRPIK3CDEPHX2
SCHEMBL3038782 0.75 ITGB2 (0.34) PIK3CD
SCHEMBL3009310 0.71 PGR (0.48) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6PGRPIK3CD
SCHEMBL1951405 0.70 PARP10 (0.43) HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6PGRPIK3CD

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100204247-A1 N-SUBSTITUTED OXINDOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS DUFFY JOSEPH L 2010-08-12 — — US claimed
EP-2205079-A1 N-SUBSTITUTED OXINDOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (US) 2010-07-14 — — EP claimed
WO-2009045381-A1 N-SUBSTITUTED OXINDOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS MERCK & CO., INC. (US) 2009-04-09 — — WO claimed
US-20100204247-A1 N-SUBSTITUTED OXINDOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS DUFFY JOSEPH L 2010-08-12 — — US disclosed
US-20100204247-A1 N-SUBSTITUTED OXINDOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS DUFFY JOSEPH L 2010-08-12 — — US disclosed
US-20100204247-A1 N-SUBSTITUTED OXINDOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS DUFFY JOSEPH L 2010-08-12 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100204247-A1 N-SUBSTITUTED OXINDOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS CACNA1I, CACNA1D, TRPV1 HDAC1 264/4885HDAC8 935/4885HDAC6 257/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback