SCHEMBL3055174

SCHEMBL3055174

O=C1CCC(c2ccccc2)(c2nsc(N3CCN(S(=O)(=O)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)F)CC3)n2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.36

Predicted protein targets (top 4)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.36
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.36
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.36
GBA1 P04062 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3063158 0.99 MEN1 (0.35) MEN1CYP2C9KMT2AGBA1
SCHEMBL3058122 0.86 KMT2A (0.39) MEN1CYP2C9KMT2AGBA1
SCHEMBL3055387 0.83 KMT2A (0.37) MEN1CYP2C9KMT2A
SCHEMBL3066620 0.82 MEN1 (0.36) MEN1CYP2C9KMT2A
SCHEMBL3063799 0.82 KMT2A (0.47) MEN1CYP2C9KMT2A
SCHEMBL3059372 0.79 MEN1 (0.39) MEN1CYP2C9KMT2A
SCHEMBL3060909 0.79 MEN1 (0.38) MEN1CYP2C9KMT2A
SCHEMBL3060345 0.79 MEN1 (0.38) MEN1CYP2C9KMT2A
SCHEMBL3049325 0.78 KMT2A (0.39) MEN1CYP2C9KMT2A
SCHEMBL3055430 0.77 MEN1 (0.36) MEN1CYP2C9KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8541406-B2 Thiadiazole derivatives for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases NV REMYND (BE) 2013-09-24 US disclosed
US-20100261707-A9 THIADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES NV REMYND (BE) 2010-10-14 US disclosed
US-20090233911-A2 THIADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES NV REMYND (BE) 2009-09-17 US disclosed
US-20090054410-A1 THIADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES NV REMYND (BE) 2009-02-26 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090233911-A2 THIADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES SNCA, HTT, PARK7 MEN1 799/4885CYP2C9 4782/4885KMT2A 1844/4885
US-20100261707-A9 THIADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES SNCA, HTT, PARK7 MEN1 799/4885CYP2C9 4782/4885KMT2A 1844/4885
US-20090054410-A1 THIADIAZOLE DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES SNCA, HTT, PARK7 MEN1 799/4885CYP2C9 4782/4885KMT2A 1844/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.