SCHEMBL3236349

SCHEMBL3236349

CCc1nc2c(c(=O)n(Cc3ccc(Cl)cc3)c(=O)n2C[Si](C)(C)C)n1C

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.50
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.50
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.49
ADORA2A P29274 2/20 0.48
ADORA2B P29275 2/20 0.48
ADORA1 P30542 1/20 0.48
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.46
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.46
POLB P06746 2/20 0.46
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.46
GAA P10253 2/20 0.46
PKM P14618 1/20 0.46
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.46
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.46
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.46
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.45
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 2/20 0.45
ALOX12 P18054 1/20 0.45
HTT P42858 2/20 0.45
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3234639 0.92 MAPT (0.55) MAPTLMNASMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA2B
SCHEMBL3238173 0.90 MAPT (0.55) MAPTLMNASMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA2B
SCHEMBL13940720 0.87 MAPT (0.51) MAPTLMNASMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA2B
SCHEMBL3229109 0.87 ADORA2A (0.59) MAPTLMNAADORA2AADORA2BADORA1
SCHEMBL3235728 0.85 MAPT (0.49) MAPTLMNASMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA2B
SCHEMBL3223266 0.85 MAPT (0.49) MAPTLMNASMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA2B
SCHEMBL3242836 0.85 ADORA2A (0.51) MAPTLMNASMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA2B
SCHEMBL3229938 0.85 MAPT (0.52) MAPTLMNASMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA2B
SCHEMBL3236885 0.85 TP53 (0.58) MAPTLMNASMN1; SMN2TSHRGAA
SCHEMBL3236650 0.84 MAPT (0.48) MAPTLMNASMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA2B

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2146996-A1 XANTHINE COMPOUNDS HAVING A POSITIVE ALLOSTERIC GABAB RECEPTOR MODULATOR EFFECT AstraZeneca AB (SE) 2010-01-27 EP claimed
US-20090023704-A1 Novel Compounds 737 ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2009-01-22 US claimed
WO-2008130314-A1 XANTHINE COMPOUNDS HAVING A POSITIVE ALLOSTERIC GABAB RECEPTOR MODULATOR EFFECT ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2008-10-30 WO claimed
EP-2146996-A1 XANTHINE COMPOUNDS HAVING A POSITIVE ALLOSTERIC GABAB RECEPTOR MODULATOR EFFECT AstraZeneca AB (SE) 2010-01-27 EP disclosed
US-20090023704-A1 Novel Compounds 737 ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2009-01-22 US disclosed
US-20090023704-A1 Novel Compounds 737 ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2009-01-22 US disclosed
WO-2008130314-A1 XANTHINE COMPOUNDS HAVING A POSITIVE ALLOSTERIC GABAB RECEPTOR MODULATOR EFFECT ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2008-10-30 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090023704-A1 Novel Compounds 737 GRPR, GABRB1, GABBR1 MAPT 2910/4885LMNA 3908/4885SMN1; SMN2 983/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.