SCHEMBL3244545

SCHEMBL3244545

CO[C@H]1O[C@H](C)[C@@H](OC(C)=O)[C@H]1OC(C)=O

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CA9 Q16790 4/20 0.46
CA2 P00918 4/20 0.46
CA12 O43570 3/20 0.46
CA1 P00915 2/20 0.46
OGA O60502 1/20 0.40
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.39
F10 P00742 1/20 0.37
CYP2D6 P10635 3/20 0.36
THRB P10828 1/20 0.36
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.36
CYP3A4 P08684 5/20 0.36
BCHE P06276 1/20 0.36
MMP9 P14780 1/20 0.33
MMP12 P39900 1/20 0.33
RPS6KA3 P51812 1/20 0.33
RPS6KA1 Q15418 1/20 0.33
LGALS8 O00214 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7215110 1.00 CA9 (0.46) CA9CA2CA12CA1OGA
SCHEMBL3238675 1.00 CA9 (0.46) CA9CA2CA12CA1OGA
SCHEMBL12651757 0.98 CA9 (0.49) CA9CA2CA12CA1OGA
SCHEMBL22227447 0.98 CA9 (0.49) CA9CA2CA12CA1OGA
SCHEMBL8153537 0.98 CA9 (0.49) CA9CA2CA12CA1OGA
SCHEMBL7642475 0.98 CA9 (0.49) CA9CA2CA12CA1OGA
SCHEMBL7148616 0.98 CA9 (0.49) CA9CA2CA12CA1OGA
SCHEMBL21575613 0.98 CA9 (0.49) CA9CA2CA12CA1OGA
SCHEMBL8152918 0.98 CA9 (0.49) CA9CA2CA12CA1OGA
SCHEMBL7152382 0.98 CA9 (0.49) CA9CA2CA12CA1OGA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8394935-B2 Method for producing furanose derivative API CORPORATION (JP) 2013-03-12 US disclosed
US-20100298550-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF RIBOFURANOSE DERIVATIVES API CORPORATION (JP) 2010-11-25 US disclosed
EP-2210896-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF RIBOFURANOSE DERIVATIVES API Corporation (JP) 2010-07-28 EP disclosed
US-20100105890-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING FURANOSE DERIVATIVE API CORPORATION (JP) 2010-04-29 US disclosed
EP-2105445-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCTION OF FURANOSE DERIVATIVE API Corporation (JP) 2009-09-30 EP disclosed
US-6617315-B1 Sugar-substituted benzimidazole derivatives are used for the treatment or prophylaxis of restenosis, particularly following angioplasty CHAMBERLAIN STANLEY DAWES (US) 2003-09-09 US disclosed
US-6204249-B1 L-benzimidazole nucleosides GLAXO WELLCOME INC. 2001-03-20 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100298550-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF RIBOFURANOSE DERIVATIVES RNASEL, RPIA, RIOX2 CA9 2740/4885CA2 2246/4885CA12 2481/4885
US-20100105890-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING FURANOSE DERIVATIVE DERA, ALDOA, DPYD CA9 793/4885CA2 1005/4885CA12 1111/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.