SCHEMBL3531970

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

	Compound	similarity	top predicted	shared targets
	SCHEMBL3540319	0.89	PTGER4 (0.56)	PTGER4POLB
	SCHEMBL14199906	0.88	PTGER4 (0.55)	PTGER4APEX1POLB
	SCHEMBL4693153	0.86	PTGER4 (0.52)	PTGER4POLB
	SCHEMBL3538565	0.83	PTGER4 (0.76)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL3533268	0.83	PTGER4 (1.00)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL3534763	0.80	PTGER4 (0.71)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL3537596	0.80	PTGER4 (0.75)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL3536223	0.79	PTGER4 (0.69)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL14201248	0.75	PTGER4 (0.54)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL3542886	0.73	PTGER4 (0.81)	PTGER4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 25 patents — showing the first 20. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (4 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.