SCHEMBL3574833

SCHEMBL3574833

CC(C)(O)c1cn(Cc2cccc(Cl)c2Cl)c(-c2ccc(-c3cccc(S(C)(=O)=O)c3)cc2)n1

nearest known ligand 0.62

Predicted protein targets (top 8)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ NR1H2 P55055 18/20 0.62
▸ NR1H3 Q13133 18/20 0.62
▸ RXRA P19793 17/20 0.62
▸ SLC16A3 O15427 1/20 0.42
▸ SLC16A1 P53985 1/20 0.42
▸ MCTS1 Q9ULC4 1/20 0.42
▸ NR1I2 O75469 1/20 0.39
▸ SDHB P21912 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3571178 0.93 NR1H2 (0.66) NR1H2NR1H3RXRASLC16A3SLC16A1
SCHEMBL15988478 0.86 RXRA (0.55) NR1H2NR1H3RXRANR1I2SDHB
SCHEMBL3583104 0.80 NR1H2 (0.74) NR1H2NR1H3RXRANR1I2
SCHEMBL3471603 0.80 SLC16A3 (0.54) NR1H2NR1H3RXRASLC16A3SLC16A1
SCHEMBL3574835 0.80 NR1H2 (0.88) NR1H2NR1H3RXRANR1I2
SCHEMBL3587208 0.78 NR1H2 (0.87) NR1H2NR1H3RXRANR1I2
SCHEMBL3582123 0.78 NR1H2 (0.70) NR1H2NR1H3RXRANR1I2
SCHEMBL13462465 0.77 NR1H2 (0.51) NR1H2NR1H3RXRASLC16A3SLC16A1
SCHEMBL3573997 0.77 NR1H2 (0.72) NR1H2NR1H3RXRANR1I2
SCHEMBL3584533 0.77 NR1H2 (1.00) NR1H2NR1H3RXRA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 14 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9000022-B2 Imidazole based LXR modulators EXELIXIS PATENT COMPANY LLC (US) 2015-04-07 — — US claimed
EP-1910308-B1 IMIDAZOLE BASED LXR MODULATORS EXELIXIS PATENT CO LLC (US) 2014-09-03 — — EP claimed
US-20140038964-A1 IMIDAZOLE BASED LXR MODULATORS EXELIXIS PATENT COMPANY LLC (US) 2014-02-06 — — US claimed
US-8569352-B2 Imidazole based LXR modulators EXELIXIS PATENT COMPANY LLC (US) 2013-10-29 — — US claimed
US-9000022-B2 Imidazole based LXR modulators EXELIXIS PATENT COMPANY LLC (US) 2015-04-07 — — US disclosed
US-9000022-B2 Imidazole based LXR modulators EXELIXIS PATENT COMPANY LLC (US) 2015-04-07 — — US disclosed
EP-1910308-B1 IMIDAZOLE BASED LXR MODULATORS EXELIXIS PATENT CO LLC (US) 2014-09-03 — — EP disclosed
US-20140038964-A1 IMIDAZOLE BASED LXR MODULATORS EXELIXIS PATENT COMPANY LLC (US) 2014-02-06 — — US disclosed
US-20140038964-A1 IMIDAZOLE BASED LXR MODULATORS EXELIXIS PATENT COMPANY LLC (US) 2014-02-06 — — US disclosed
US-8569352-B2 Imidazole based LXR modulators EXELIXIS PATENT COMPANY LLC (US) 2013-10-29 — — US disclosed
US-8569352-B2 Imidazole based LXR modulators EXELIXIS PATENT COMPANY LLC (US) 2013-10-29 — — US disclosed
US-20100075964-A1 IMIDAZOLE BASED LXR MODULATORS EXELIXIS, INC. (US) 2010-03-25 — — US disclosed
US-20100075964-A1 IMIDAZOLE BASED LXR MODULATORS EXELIXIS, INC. (US) 2010-03-25 — — US disclosed
WO-2007002563-A1 IMIDAZOLE BASED LXR MODULATORS EXELIXIS, INC. (US) 2007-01-04 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20140038964-A1 IMIDAZOLE BASED LXR MODULATORS NR1H2, NR1H3, NR1H4 NR1H2 1/4885NR1H3 2/4885RXRA 17/4885
US-20100075964-A1 IMIDAZOLE BASED LXR MODULATORS NR1H2, NR1H3, NR1I2 NR1H2 1/4885NR1H3 2/4885RXRA 17/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback