SCHEMBL3738433

SCHEMBL3738433

COc1ccc2c(c1)/C(=N\O)c1c-2cnc2ccccc12

nearest known ligand 0.65

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TOP1 P11387 6/20 0.65
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.56
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.56
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.56
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.56
APP P05067 1/20 0.56
SNCA P37840 1/20 0.56
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.43
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.43
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.43
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.43
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.43
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.43
HTT P42858 1/20 0.43
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.42
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.42
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.42
BLM P54132 1/20 0.42
AURKA O14965 1/20 0.40
KDR P35968 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3738436 1.00 TOP1 (0.65) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1
SCHEMBL3741119 0.81 TOP1 (0.56) TOP1ALDH1A1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6
SCHEMBL3738459 0.79 MEN1 (0.51) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1
SCHEMBL3738460 0.79 MEN1 (0.51) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1
SCHEMBL3736590 0.76 TOP1 (1.00) TOP1KMT2A
SCHEMBL3737923 0.71 TOP1 (0.71) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1
SCHEMBL3737922 0.71 TOP1 (0.71) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1
SCHEMBL7786952 0.68 KMT2A (0.85) MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1APP
SCHEMBL7789347 0.65 MEN1 (0.57) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1
SCHEMBL20474256 0.65 KDM4E (0.53) MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1CYP1A2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7829567-B2 Imino-indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2010-11-09 US claimed
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2009-04-30 US claimed
US-7829567-B2 Imino-indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2010-11-09 US disclosed
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2009-04-30 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same IMPA1, IMPDH1, IPO5 TOP1 265/4885MEN1 152/4885KMT2A 1737/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.