SCHEMBL3738460

SCHEMBL3738460

COc1ccc2c(c1)C(=NO)c1c-2c(O)nc2ccccc12

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.51
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.51
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.51
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.51
APP P05067 1/20 0.51
SNCA P37840 1/20 0.51
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.45
GUSB P08236 1/20 0.45
POLB P06746 1/20 0.45
TOP1 P11387 8/20 0.44
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.41
GRM2 Q14416 1/20 0.41
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.40
ACACA Q13085 1/20 0.40
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.40
HTT P42858 1/20 0.40
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.40
RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3738459 1.00 MEN1 (0.51) MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1APP
SCHEMBL3733796 0.82 GUSB (0.52) MEN1KMT2AKDM4EGUSBPOLB
SCHEMBL3738433 0.79 TOP1 (0.65) MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1APP
SCHEMBL3738436 0.79 TOP1 (0.65) MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1APP
SCHEMBL3737923 0.79 TOP1 (0.71) MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1APP
SCHEMBL3737922 0.79 TOP1 (0.71) MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1APP
SCHEMBL3742091 0.78 TOP1 (0.73) TOP1
SCHEMBL7822017 0.68 NTRK1 (0.51) MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1KDM4EGUSB
SCHEMBL3736581 0.68 NTRK1 (0.51) MEN1KMT2AALDH1A1KDM4EGUSB
SCHEMBL7789346 0.67 MEN1 (0.57) MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1APP

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7829567-B2 Imino-indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2010-11-09 US claimed
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2009-04-30 US claimed
US-7829567-B2 Imino-indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2010-11-09 US disclosed
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2009-04-30 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same IMPA1, IMPDH1, IPO5 MEN1 152/4885KMT2A 1737/4885MAPT 2085/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.