SCHEMBL3738992

SCHEMBL3738992

CON=C1c2ccccc2-c2c(N3CCNCC3)nc3ccccc3c21

nearest known ligand 0.61

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TOP1 P11387 5/20 0.61
CYP1A2 P05177 5/20 0.49
CYP3A4 P08684 4/20 0.49
CYP2D6 P10635 3/20 0.49
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.49
CLK4 Q9HAZ1 1/20 0.49
HTR6 P50406 1/20 0.47
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.46
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.46
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.46
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.46
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.46
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.46
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.44
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.44
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.44
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3741028 0.78 HTR6 (0.53) TOP1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6TSHR
SCHEMBL3737923 0.78 TOP1 (0.71) TOP1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6TSHR
SCHEMBL3737922 0.78 TOP1 (0.71) TOP1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6TSHR
SCHEMBL3737910 0.77 TOP1 (1.00) TOP1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6TSHR
SCHEMBL3739674 0.77 TOP1 (1.00) TOP1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6TSHR
SCHEMBL3737470 0.76 TOP1 (1.00) TOP1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6TSHR
SCHEMBL3741161 0.76 TOP1 (0.82) TOP1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6TSHR
SCHEMBL3746375 0.76 TOP1 (0.51) TOP1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6TSHR
SCHEMBL3746327 0.75 TOP1 (1.00) TOP1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6TSHR
SCHEMBL3738458 0.74 TOP1 (0.64) TOP1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6TSHR

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7829567-B2 Imino-indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2010-11-09 US claimed
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2009-04-30 US claimed
US-7829567-B2 Imino-indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2010-11-09 US disclosed
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2009-04-30 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same IMPA1, IMPDH1, IPO5 TOP1 265/4885CYP1A2 103/4885CYP3A4 123/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.