SCHEMBL4013630

SCHEMBL4013630

CS(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1S(=O)(=O)Oc1ccc2[nH]nc(NC(=O)c3ccccc3)c2c1

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ CDK7 P50613 11/20 0.53
▸ LRRK2 Q5S007 2/20 0.47
▸ FGFR1 P11362 3/20 0.46
▸ FGFR3 P22607 3/20 0.46
▸ FGFR2 P21802 2/20 0.46
▸ ULK1 O75385 1/20 0.46
▸ CDK2 P24941 1/20 0.45
▸ FLT3 P36888 2/20 0.44
▸ JAK2 O60674 2/20 0.44
▸ CDC7 O00311 1/20 0.44
▸ PLK4 O00444 1/20 0.44
▸ CHEK1 O14757 1/20 0.44
▸ AURKA O14965 1/20 0.44
▸ DCLK1 O15075 1/20 0.44
▸ MAPK13 O15264 1/20 0.44
▸ PDPK1 O15530 1/20 0.44
▸ DAPK3 O43293 1/20 0.44
▸ ROCK2 O75116 1/20 0.44
▸ PRKD3 O94806 1/20 0.44
▸ MAP4K4 O95819 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4008083 0.83 CDK7 (0.48) CDK7LRRK2FGFR1FGFR3FGFR2
SCHEMBL4009831 0.82 CSNK2A1 (0.54) CDK2FLT3JAK2MAP4K4CDK1
SCHEMBL1460525 0.82 LRRK2 (0.53) CDK7LRRK2FGFR1FGFR3FGFR2
SCHEMBL4003421 0.81 CDK7 (0.48) CDK7FGFR1FGFR3FGFR2ULK1
SCHEMBL4009506 0.81 CDK7 (0.48) CDK7FGFR1FGFR3FGFR2ULK1
SCHEMBL4008356 0.80 YTHDC1 (0.53) CDK2FLT3CSNK2A1PRKAA1PAK1
SCHEMBL4008460 0.79 CDK7 (0.48) CDK7FGFR1FGFR3FGFR2ULK1
SCHEMBL2482107 0.79 FLT3 (0.59) CDK7FGFR1FGFR3FGFR2CDK2
SCHEMBL4006912 0.79 MEN1 (0.41) MAPK8CSNK2A1NTRK1
SCHEMBL2480608 0.79 FLT3 (0.59) CDK7FGFR1FGFR3FGFR2CDK2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7473701-B2 Substituted indazoles, compositions containing them, method of production and use AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. (FR) 2009-01-06 — — US disclosed
US-20050059722-A1 Substituted indazoles, compositions containing them, method of production and use AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. (FR) 2005-03-17 — — US disclosed
US-6858638-B2 Substituted indazoles, compositions containing them, method of production and use AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. (FR) 2005-02-22 — — US disclosed
US-20040106667-A1 Substituted indazoles, compositions containing them, method of production and use AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. (FR) 2004-06-03 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040106667-A1 Substituted indazoles, compositions containing them, method of production and use ABL1, CDK3, CILK1 CDK7 29/4885LRRK2 527/4885FGFR1 609/4885
US-20050059722-A1 Substituted indazoles, compositions containing them, method of production and use ABL1, CDK3, CILK1 CDK7 33/4885LRRK2 671/4885FGFR1 725/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback