SCHEMBL4236665

SCHEMBL4236665

CCOc1cc(NC(=O)NC(CC)CC)ccc1Oc1ccc(N)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PKM P14618 1/20 0.52
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.47
TDP1 Q9NUW8 3/20 0.45
TAS1R3 Q7RTX0 2/20 0.45
TAS1R1 Q7RTX1 2/20 0.45
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.44
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.44
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.44
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.44
MCHR1 Q99705 1/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 6/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.41
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.41
RORC P51449 1/20 0.40
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.40
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.40
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.40
POLB P06746 2/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.39
HTT P42858 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4237939 0.91 MAPT (0.52) PKMALDH1A1TAS1R3TAS1R1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL4228811 0.90 PKM (0.60) PKMALDH1A1TAS1R3TAS1R1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL4236662 0.89 PKM (0.50) PKMALDH1A1TDP1TAS1R3TAS1R1
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL4235457 0.89 PKM (0.58) PKMALDH1A1TAS1R3TAS1R1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL4233270 0.89 PKM (0.52) PKMALDH1A1TDP1TAS1R3TAS1R1
SCHEMBL4237924 0.89 PKM (0.55) PKMALDH1A1TDP1TAS1R3TAS1R1
SCHEMBL4229305 0.88 PKM (0.60) PKMALDH1A1TAS1R3TAS1R1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL4238162 0.87 PKM (0.52) PKMALDH1A1TDP1TAS1R3TAS1R1
SCHEMBL4226997 0.86 PKM (0.47) PKMALDH1A1TDP1TAS1R3TAS1R1
SCHEMBL4228260 0.86 PKM (0.54) PKMALDH1A1TAS1R3TAS1R1SMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090233910-A1 Npy antagonists, preparation and uses CEREP (FR) 2009-09-17 US claimed
EP-1879887-A2 NPY ANTAGONISTS, PREPARATION AND USE Cerep (FR) 2008-01-23 EP claimed
WO-2006108965-A2 NPY ANTAGONISTS, PREPARATION AND USE CEREP (FR) 2006-10-19 WO claimed
US-20090233910-A1 Npy antagonists, preparation and uses CEREP (FR) 2009-09-17 US disclosed
US-20090233910-A1 Npy antagonists, preparation and uses CEREP (FR) 2009-09-17 US disclosed
US-20090233910-A1 Npy antagonists, preparation and uses CEREP (FR) 2009-09-17 US disclosed
EP-1879887-A2 NPY ANTAGONISTS, PREPARATION AND USE Cerep (FR) 2008-01-23 EP disclosed
WO-2006108965-A2 NPY ANTAGONISTS, PREPARATION AND USE CEREP (FR) 2006-10-19 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090233910-A1 Npy antagonists, preparation and uses NPY1R, NPY5R, NPY2R PKM 1734/4885ALDH1A1 4542/4885TDP1 2128/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.