SCHEMBL4418070

SCHEMBL4418070

Cc1ccc2c(c1)C=CC(C(=N)NO)N2C(=O)c1ccc(Cl)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ LMNA P02545 2/20 0.47
▸ SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.47
▸ POLB P06746 1/20 0.36
▸ RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.36
▸ MGLL Q99685 1/20 0.35
▸ HCRTR2 O43614 1/20 0.35
▸ MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.34
▸ KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.34
▸ CXCR3 P49682 1/20 0.34
▸ CES2 O00748 1/20 0.34
▸ CES1 P23141 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4418068 0.81 LMNA (0.48) LMNASMN1; SMN2RAB9AMGLLHCRTR2
SCHEMBL4418064 0.81 LMNA (0.48) LMNASMN1; SMN2RAB9AMGLLHCRTR2
SCHEMBL4422567 0.76 LMNA (0.79) LMNASMN1; SMN2MGLLHCRTR2MEN1
SCHEMBL8343101 0.73 MEN1 (0.48) LMNASMN1; SMN2RAB9AMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL8340571 0.70 MEN1 (0.45) LMNASMN1; SMN2MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL8346666 0.70 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) LMNASMN1; SMN2POLBMGLLMEN1
SCHEMBL4429170 0.69 LMNA (0.67) LMNASMN1; SMN2MGLLMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL4429146 0.68 LMNA (0.65) LMNASMN1; SMN2POLBRAB9AMGLL
SCHEMBL6195822 0.65 LMNA (1.00) LMNASMN1; SMN2POLBMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL12868271 0.63 LMNA (0.59) LMNASMN1; SMN2HCRTR2MEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7553967-B2 1,2-Dihydroquinoline derivatives and method for using the same to treat HIV infections WYETH (US) 2009-06-30 — — US claimed
WO-2005090309-A1 1,2-DIHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND METHOD FOR USING THE SAME TO TREAT HIV INFECTION WYETH (US) 2005-09-29 — — WO claimed
US-20050203129-A1 1, 2-Dihydroquinoline derivatives and method for using the same to treat HIV infections WYETH 2005-09-15 — — US claimed
US-7553967-B2 1,2-Dihydroquinoline derivatives and method for using the same to treat HIV infections WYETH (US) 2009-06-30 — — US disclosed
WO-2005090309-A1 1,2-DIHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND METHOD FOR USING THE SAME TO TREAT HIV INFECTION WYETH (US) 2005-09-29 — — WO disclosed
US-20050203129-A1 1, 2-Dihydroquinoline derivatives and method for using the same to treat HIV infections WYETH 2005-09-15 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050203129-A1 1, 2-Dihydroquinoline derivatives and method for using the same to treat HIV infections CBR3, CBR1, NR1H3 LMNA 4140/4885SMN1; SMN2 4136/4885POLB 1694/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback