SCHEMBL4517500

SCHEMBL4517500

CN(C)c1ccc(Nc2nccc(-c3c[nH]c4ccccc34)n2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.60

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
FLT3 P36888 3/20 0.60
MKNK1 Q9BUB5 2/20 0.60
MKNK2 Q9HBH9 2/20 0.60
CDK1 P06493 5/20 0.59
CCNB2 O95067 4/20 0.59
CCNB1 P14635 4/20 0.59
CCNB3 Q8WWL7 4/20 0.59
RET P07949 6/20 0.56
EIF2AK2 P19525 1/20 0.56
EGFR P00533 2/20 0.54
ABL1 P00519 1/20 0.54
BCR P11274 1/20 0.54
SRC P12931 1/20 0.54
PRKCA P17252 1/20 0.54
PRKACA P17612 1/20 0.54
PRKACG P22612 1/20 0.54
PRKACB P22694 1/20 0.54
PRKCD Q05655 1/20 0.54
BRD4 O60885 1/20 0.53
CDK7 P50613 2/20 0.53

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL12723414 0.88 DYRK1A (0.53) FLT3MKNK1MKNK2CDK1CCNB2
SCHEMBL3770552 0.87 CDK1 (0.77) FLT3CDK1CCNB2CCNB1CCNB3
SCHEMBL31588329 0.87 CCNB2 (0.76) FLT3MKNK1MKNK2CDK1CCNB2
SCHEMBL144954 0.87 CCNB2 (0.76) FLT3MKNK1MKNK2CDK1CCNB2
SCHEMBL4510383 0.85 FLT3 (0.64) FLT3MKNK1MKNK2CDK1CCNB2
SCHEMBL7467183 0.84 FLT3 (0.60) FLT3MKNK1MKNK2CDK1CCNB2
SCHEMBL140969 0.81 CCNB2 (0.64) FLT3MKNK1MKNK2CDK1CCNB2
SCHEMBL23624996 0.80 FLT3 (0.58) FLT3MKNK1MKNK2CDK1CCNB2
SCHEMBL4507802 0.79 FLT3 (0.60) FLT3MKNK1MKNK2CDK1CCNB2
SCHEMBL20691186 0.79 EIF2AK2 (0.67) FLT3MKNK1MKNK2CDK1CCNB2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090318446-A1 4-(1H-Indol-3-yl)-Pyrimidin-2-Ylamine Derivatives and Their Use in Therapy CYCLACEL LIMITED (GB) 2009-12-24 US claimed
EP-1836194-A1 4- (1H-INDOL-3-YL) -PYRIMIDIN-2-YLAMINE DERIVATES AND THEIR USE IN THERAPY Cyclacel Limited (GB) 2007-09-26 EP claimed
WO-2006075152-A1 4- (1H-INDOL-3-YL) -PYRIMIDIN-2-YLAMINE DERIVATES AND THEIR USE IN THERAPY CYCLACEL LIMITED (GB) 2006-07-20 WO claimed
US-20090318446-A1 4-(1H-Indol-3-yl)-Pyrimidin-2-Ylamine Derivatives and Their Use in Therapy CYCLACEL LIMITED (GB) 2009-12-24 US disclosed
US-20090318446-A1 4-(1H-Indol-3-yl)-Pyrimidin-2-Ylamine Derivatives and Their Use in Therapy CYCLACEL LIMITED (GB) 2009-12-24 US disclosed
US-20090318446-A1 4-(1H-Indol-3-yl)-Pyrimidin-2-Ylamine Derivatives and Their Use in Therapy CYCLACEL LIMITED (GB) 2009-12-24 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090318446-A1 4-(1H-Indol-3-yl)-Pyrimidin-2-Ylamine Derivatives and Their Use in Therapy ABL1, CDK2, JAK2 FLT3 91/4885MKNK1 109/4885MKNK2 62/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.