SCHEMBL4771868

SCHEMBL4771868

CC(C)(C)c1ccc(NC(=O)c2cccnc2Nc2cccc3c2CNC3=O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TOP1 P11387 1/20 0.46
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.45
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.45
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.45
GAA P10253 2/20 0.45
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.45
PDPK1 O15530 1/20 0.44
TRPV1 Q8NER1 5/20 0.44
KDR P35968 3/20 0.44
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.43
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.43
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.43
DHPS P49366 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3953548 0.91 RXFP1 (0.47) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTGAA
SCHEMBL4774058 0.91 KDR (0.56) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTGAA
SCHEMBL4774082 0.89 KDR (0.47) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTGAA
SCHEMBL3955743 0.88 PDPK1 (0.43) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTGAA
SCHEMBL4767610 0.88 KDR (0.48) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTGAA
SCHEMBL3951692 0.87 TOP1 (0.46) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTGAA
SCHEMBL4773961 0.86 PDPK1 (0.40) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTGAA
SCHEMBL3959062 0.85 TOP1 (0.46) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTGAA
SCHEMBL4768281 0.83 KDR (0.55) MEN1KMT2AMAPTALDH1A1KDR
SCHEMBL3960914 0.83 TOP1 (0.46) TOP1MEN1KMT2AMAPTGAA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1562933-B1 SUBSTITUTED AMINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE IN THE TREATMENT OF ANGIOGENESIS RELATED DISORDERS AMGEN INC (US) 2008-03-19 EP claimed
US-7102009-B2 Substituted amine derivatives and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-09-05 US claimed
US-20030203922-A1 Substituted amine derivatives and methods of use AMGEN INC. 2003-10-30 US claimed
EP-1562933-B1 SUBSTITUTED AMINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE IN THE TREATMENT OF ANGIOGENESIS RELATED DISORDERS AMGEN INC (US) 2008-03-19 EP disclosed
EP-1562933-B1 SUBSTITUTED AMINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE IN THE TREATMENT OF ANGIOGENESIS RELATED DISORDERS AMGEN INC (US) 2008-03-19 EP disclosed
US-7102009-B2 Substituted amine derivatives and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-09-05 US disclosed
EP-1562933-A2 SUBSTITUTED AMINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE IN THE TREATMENT OF ANGIOGENESIS RELATED DISORDERS Amgen Inc. (US) 2005-08-17 EP disclosed
WO-2004007481-A2 SUBSTITUTED AMINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE IN THE TREATMENT OF ANGIOGENESIS RELATES DISORDERS AMGEN INC. (US) 2004-01-22 WO disclosed
US-20030203922-A1 Substituted amine derivatives and methods of use AMGEN INC. 2003-10-30 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030203922-A1 Substituted amine derivatives and methods of use MAOB, HNMT, FLT4 TOP1 1093/4885MEN1 664/4885KMT2A 1259/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.