SCHEMBL4965974

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

	Compound	similarity	top predicted	shared targets
	SCHEMBL4965999	0.96	ESR1 (0.53)	ESR1ESR2
	SCHEMBL4965002	0.86	ESR1 (0.50)	ESR1ESR2GAA
	SCHEMBL4965710	0.81	ESR1 (0.55)	ESR1ESR2GAA
	SCHEMBL4965284	0.78	PTGDR2 (0.34)	ESR1ESR2
	SCHEMBL4965912	0.75	FFAR4 (0.32)	ESR1ESR2GAA
	SCHEMBL4966004	0.74	MAPT (0.40)	ESR1ESR2GAA
	SCHEMBL7705320	0.72	ESR2 (0.53)	ESR1ESR2
	SCHEMBL5851842	0.69	ESR1 (0.52)	ESR1ESR2
	SCHEMBL8497550	0.69	ESR1 (0.49)	ESR1ESR2
	SCHEMBL8498096	0.68	ESR1 (0.48)	ESR1ESR2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 14 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.