SCHEMBL4967864

SCHEMBL4967864

CCCNC(=O)C(CCC(=O)O)NP(N)(=O)N1CCC[C@H](N)C1=O

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
DPP4 P27487 5/20 0.44
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.33
GGH Q92820 1/20 0.33
CCKBR P32239 1/20 0.31
FAP Q12884 1/20 0.30
DPP8 Q6V1X1 1/20 0.30
DPP9 Q86TI2 1/20 0.30
DPP7 Q9UHL4 1/20 0.30
ACE2 Q9BYF1 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4965556 0.92 DPP4 (0.44) DPP4LMNA
SCHEMBL4965687 0.90 DPP4 (0.46) DPP4LMNA
SCHEMBL4964998 0.88 DPP4 (0.47) DPP4LMNA
SCHEMBL4965749 0.87 DPP4 (0.43) DPP4
SCHEMBL4968314 0.87 DPP4 (0.43) DPP4LMNAFAP
SCHEMBL4965052 0.87 DPP4 (0.46) DPP4LMNA
SCHEMBL4965419 0.86 DPP4 (0.46) DPP4LMNA
SCHEMBL4968320 0.86 DPP4 (0.46) DPP4LMNA
SCHEMBL4967555 0.85 DPP4 (0.41) DPP4LMNA
SCHEMBL4964334 0.84 L3MBTL1 (0.45) DPP4ACE2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1489088-B1 NOVEL ALPHA-AMINO-N-(DIAMINOPHOSPHINYL)LACTAM DERIVATIVE NIPPON KAYAKU KK (JP) 2008-08-13 EP disclosed
US-7348318-B2 α-Amino-N-(diaminophosphinyl)lactam derivatives NIPPON KAYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA (JP) 2008-03-25 US disclosed
US-20050164989-A1 Novel $g(a)-amino-n-(diaminophosphinyl) lactam derivative NIPPON KAYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA (JP) 2005-07-28 US disclosed
EP-1489088-A1 NOVEL ALPHA-AMINO-N-(DIAMINOPHOSPHINYL)LACTAM DERIVATIVE Nippon Kayaku Kabushiki Kaisha (JP) 2004-12-22 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050164989-A1 Novel $g(a)-amino-n-(diaminophosphinyl) lactam derivative DNPEP, PEPD, ANPEP DPP4 8/4885LMNA 2427/4885GGH 28/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.