SCHEMBL5070039

SCHEMBL5070039

NC(=O)C1CCC(C(O)(C(F)(F)F)C(F)(F)F)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.35

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GAA P10253 2/20 0.35
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.35
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.34
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.33
ABL1 P00519 1/20 0.33
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.33
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.31
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.31
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.31
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.31
LIPA P38571 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3133229 0.80 GAA (0.38) GAATDP1SMN1; SMN2KDM4EABL1
SCHEMBL670427 0.80 GAA (0.38) GAATDP1SMN1; SMN2KDM4EABL1
SCHEMBL670428 0.80 GAA (0.38) GAATDP1SMN1; SMN2KDM4EABL1
SCHEMBL133236 0.79 LIPA (0.30) LIPA
SCHEMBL6476226 0.74 SMN1; SMN2 (0.41) GAASMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL16841453 0.74 SMN1; SMN2 (0.41) GAASMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNAMAPT
Cyclopropanecarboxylic Acid Amide SCHEMBL5661 0.74
SCHEMBL9797557 0.74 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) GAATDP1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL28418543 0.74 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) GAATDP1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL383436 0.74 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) GAATDP1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
JP-2008524280-A 2008-07-10 JP claimed
EP-1831158-A1 NOVEL CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVES F. Hoffmann-Roche AG (CH) 2007-09-12 EP claimed
US-7253282-B2 Hexafluoroisopropanol substituted cyclohexane derivatives HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2007-08-07 US claimed
WO-2006066779-A1 NOVEL CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVES F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2006-06-29 WO claimed
US-20060135601-A1 Novel hexafluoroisopropanol substituted cyclohexane derivatives HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. 2006-06-22 US claimed
EP-1831158-A1 NOVEL CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVES F. Hoffmann-Roche AG (CH) 2007-09-12 EP disclosed
US-7253282-B2 Hexafluoroisopropanol substituted cyclohexane derivatives HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2007-08-07 US disclosed
WO-2006066779-A1 NOVEL CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVES F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2006-06-29 WO disclosed
US-20060135601-A1 Novel hexafluoroisopropanol substituted cyclohexane derivatives HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. 2006-06-22 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060135601-A1 Novel hexafluoroisopropanol substituted cyclohexane derivatives NR1H3, NR1H2, NR1I2 GAA 2701/4885TDP1 4479/4885SMN1; SMN2 4559/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.