Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid

Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid

SCHEMBL5560176

O=S(=O)([O-])C(F)(F)F.O=S(=O)([O-])C(F)(F)F.O=S(=O)([O-])C(F)(F)F.O=S(=O)([O-])C(F)(F)F.[Mn+2].[Mn+2]

nearest known ligand 0.44

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CA1 P00915 2/20 0.44
CA2 P00918 2/20 0.44
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.44
CA13 Q8N1Q1 1/20 0.44
GPR3 P46089 2/20 0.42
ACHE P22303 2/20 0.33
KCNH2 Q12809 6/20 0.31
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.31
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.31
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.31
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.31
F2 P00734 1/20 0.30
PRSS1 P07477 1/20 0.30
PRSS2 P07478 1/20 0.30
PRSS3 P35030 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL1172297 1.00 CA1 (0.44) CA1CA2CA7CA13GPR3
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL25285896 0.92 CA1 (0.44) CA1CA2CA7CA13GPR3
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL20570425 0.92
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL19915225 0.92 CA1 (0.44) CA1CA2CA7CA13GPR3
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL25292546 0.92 GPR3 (0.48) CA1CA2CA7CA13GPR3
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL25255863 0.92 CA1 (0.44) CA1CA2CA7CA13GPR3
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL25287606 0.92 CA1 (0.44) CA1CA2CA7CA13GPR3
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL25292878 0.92 CA1 (0.44) CA1CA2CA7CA13GPR3
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL25301943 0.92 CA1 (0.44) CA1CA2CA7CA13GPR3
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL23430060 0.92 CA1 (0.44) CA1CA2CA7CA13GPR3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1338337-B1 Catalysts and methods for catalytic oxidation PROCTER & GAMBLE (US) 2007-07-18 EP disclosed
US-20020173644-A1 Methods of making cross-bridged macropolycycles HILER GEORGE DOUGLAS (US) 2002-11-21 US disclosed
EP-0977828-A1 BLEACH COMPOSITIONS THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2000-02-09 EP disclosed
EP-0971927-A1 IMPROVED METHODS OF MAKING CROSS-BRIDGED MACROPOLYCYCLES THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2000-01-19 EP disclosed
WO-1998039406-A1 BLEACH COMPOSITIONS THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 1998-09-11 WO disclosed
WO-1998039335-A1 IMPROVED METHODS OF MAKING CROSS-BRIDGED MACROPOLYCYCLES THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 1998-09-11 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020173644-A1 Methods of making cross-bridged macropolycycles PCNA, MACROD1, MACROD2 CA1 2101/4885CA2 3251/4885CA7 2302/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.