SCHEMBL6019950

SCHEMBL6019950

CN1CCN(CCC[C@H]2CC[C@H](CCN(C)C(=O)Oc3ccc(C(F)(F)F)cc3)CC2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LSS P48449 7/20 0.55
SLC6A5 Q9Y345 5/20 0.44
MCHR1 Q99705 1/20 0.43
HTR2A P28223 2/20 0.40
HTR2C P28335 2/20 0.40
HTR7 P34969 2/20 0.40
NAAA Q02083 1/20 0.40
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.39
DRD4 P21917 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6019946 1.00 LSS (0.55) LSSSLC6A5MCHR1HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL6019933 0.92 LSS (0.52) LSSSLC6A5MCHR1NAAA
SCHEMBL6019936 0.92 LSS (0.52) LSSSLC6A5MCHR1NAAA
SCHEMBL6018395 0.91 LSS (0.51) LSSSLC6A5MCHR1HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL6018399 0.91 LSS (0.51) LSSSLC6A5MCHR1HTR2AHTR2C
SCHEMBL6019454 0.90 LSS (0.51) LSSSLC6A5MCHR1NAAA
SCHEMBL6019452 0.90 LSS (0.51) LSSSLC6A5MCHR1NAAA
SCHEMBL6018967 0.84 LSS (0.58) LSSSLC6A5MCHR1NAAA
SCHEMBL6018970 0.84 LSS (0.58) LSSSLC6A5MCHR1NAAA
SCHEMBL6019082 0.82 LSS (0.60) LSS

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1456171-B1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVES HOFFMANN LA ROCHE (CH) 2006-12-20 EP disclosed
US-20050272774-A1 Substituted cyclohexane derivatives ACKERMANN JEAN 2005-12-08 US disclosed
US-6953806-B2 Substituted cyclohexane derivatives HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2005-10-11 US disclosed
US-20030199550-A1 Substituted cyclohexane derivatives F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2003-10-23 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050272774-A1 Substituted cyclohexane derivatives LSS, CYP51A1, CYP8B1 LSS 1/4885SLC6A5 3839/4885MCHR1 2464/4885
US-20030199550-A1 Substituted cyclohexane derivatives CYP51A1, LSS, CYP46A1 LSS 2/4885SLC6A5 4108/4885MCHR1 1929/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.