SCHEMBL6079965

SCHEMBL6079965

CC(C(=O)O)=C(Nc1cc(C(F)(F)F)ccc1OCc1ccccc1)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.54

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.54
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.54
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.54
HTT P42858 2/20 0.54
LRRK2 Q5S007 3/20 0.50
RXRA P19793 2/20 0.49
RXRB P28702 2/20 0.49
RXRG P48443 2/20 0.49
BRD4 O60885 1/20 0.49
MRGPRX4 Q96LA9 5/20 0.48
PTGER1 P34995 2/20 0.48
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.47
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.47
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.47
IDH2 P48735 1/20 0.47
PSEN1 P49768 2/20 0.46
PTGES O14684 1/20 0.46
ALOX5 P09917 1/20 0.46
PPARG P37231 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6588856 0.80 HTT (0.51) CYP1A2CYP2C9CYP2C19HTTLRRK2
SCHEMBL6588851 0.80 HTT (0.51) CYP1A2CYP2C9CYP2C19HTTLRRK2
SCHEMBL6079962 0.78 HTT (0.53) CYP1A2CYP2C9CYP2C19HTTLRRK2
SCHEMBL4721826 0.76 LRRK2 (0.64) CYP2C9CYP2C19HTTLRRK2RXRA
SCHEMBL15561372 0.76 HTR2C (0.53) HTTLRRK2RXRARXRBRXRG
SCHEMBL13812844 0.74 TMPRSS4 (0.64) HTTLRRK2MRGPRX4KDM4EHPGD
SCHEMBL4200632 0.73 LRRK2 (0.63) LRRK2RXRARXRBRXRGMRGPRX4
SCHEMBL18703359 0.72 MRGPRX4 (0.61) LRRK2RXRARXRBRXRGMRGPRX4
SCHEMBL25426801 0.72 BRD4 (0.67) CYP1A2CYP2C9CYP2C19HTTBRD4
SCHEMBL29824416 0.72 BRD4 (0.67) CYP1A2CYP2C9CYP2C19HTTBRD4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NEURO3D (FR) 2006-08-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060183909-A1 Compositions derived from quinoline and quinoxaline, preparation and use thereof NQO1, NQO2, RECQL CYP1A2 117/4885CYP2C9 199/4885CYP2C19 254/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.