SCHEMBL6433756

SCHEMBL6433756

C[C@H](c1ccccc1)N(CC(=O)OC(C)(C)C)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(NC(=N)N)c2c1

nearest known ligand 0.45

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 16/20 0.45
PLG P00747 7/20 0.39
PLAT P00750 3/20 0.39
DAGLA Q9Y4D2 1/20 0.38
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.35
GAA P10253 1/20 0.35
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.35
RORC P51449 2/20 0.34
RORB Q92753 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6433781 1.00 PLAU (0.45) PLAUPLGPLATDAGLALMNA
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6433996 0.89 PLAU (0.49) PLAUPLGPLATDAGLA
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6437367 0.89 PLAU (0.49) PLAUPLGPLATDAGLA
SCHEMBL6435157 0.87 PLAU (0.46) PLAUPLGPLATDAGLALMNA
SCHEMBL6436527 0.87 PLAU (0.46) PLAUPLGPLATDAGLALMNA
SCHEMBL6437492 0.85 PLAU (0.55) PLAUPLGPLATLMNAGAA
SCHEMBL6434470 0.85 PLAU (0.44) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6434219 0.84 PLAU (0.52) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6432627 0.84 PLAU (0.56) PLAUPLGPLATLMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6437339 0.83 PLAU (0.59) PLAUPLGPLAT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.