Trifluoroacetic Acid

Trifluoroacetic Acid

SCHEMBL6437287

N=C(N)Nc1ncc(Cl)c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)N(CC(=O)O)c3ccccc3)cc12.O=C(O)C(F)(F)F

nearest known ligand 0.64

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 9/20 0.64
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.45
PLG P00747 2/20 0.41
KEAP1 Q14145 1/20 0.40
NFE2L2 Q16236 1/20 0.40
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.39
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.39
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.39
THRB P10828 1/20 0.39
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.39
TLR9 Q9NR96 1/20 0.39
PLAT P00750 1/20 0.39
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.38
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.38
TRPM8 Q7Z2W7 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6437292 0.88 PLAU (0.53) PLAUL3MBTL1PLGMAPTNPC1
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6432740 0.87 PLAU (0.62) PLAUL3MBTL1PLGPLAT
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6435143 0.86 PLAU (0.65) PLAUL3MBTL1PLGMAPTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6437492 0.85 PLAU (0.55) PLAUPLGMAPTNPC1TP53
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6432841 0.83 PLAU (0.52) PLAUPLGKEAP1MAPTSMN1; SMN2
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6434439 0.82 PLAU (0.59) PLAUPLGMAPTPLATLMNA
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6435316 0.81 PLAU (0.56) PLAUPLGPLAT
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6437834 0.81 PLAU (0.50) PLAUPLGKEAP1MAPTTP53
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6434346 0.81 F2 (0.40) PLAUSMN1; SMN2
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6434729 0.80 PLAU (0.62) PLAUPLGPLAT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885L3MBTL1 2500/4885PLG 33/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885L3MBTL1 2500/4885PLG 33/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.