SCHEMBL6438581

SCHEMBL6438581

N=C(N)Nc1ncc(Cl)c2ccc(S(=O)(=O)NCCC(=O)OC(=O)C(F)(F)F)cc12

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 17/20 0.51
PLG P00747 9/20 0.39
PLAT P00750 4/20 0.39
GAA P10253 1/20 0.36
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.36
HTT P42858 1/20 0.36
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.36
F2 P00734 1/20 0.35
TMPRSS6 Q8IU80 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6434734 0.91 PLAU (0.49) PLAUPLGPLATF2TMPRSS6
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6438578 0.86 PLAU (0.63) PLAUPLGPLATF2TMPRSS6
SCHEMBL6433070 0.86 PLAU (0.52) PLAUPLGPLATGAATSHR
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6434729 0.81 PLAU (0.62) PLAUPLGPLATF2TMPRSS6
SCHEMBL6433471 0.81 PLAU (0.40) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6434317 0.81 PLAU (0.51) PLAUPLGPLATSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6437934 0.80 PLAU (0.53) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6437292 0.79 PLAU (0.53) PLAUPLGHTTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6432761 0.78 PLAU (0.51) PLAUPLGPLATF2TMPRSS6
SCHEMBL6436937 0.78 PLG (0.53) PLAUPLGPLATGAASMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.