SCHEMBL6456989

SCHEMBL6456989

Cc1ccc(Oc2ncccc2C(=O)N[C@H]2CC[C@@H](Nc3ccc4ccccc4n3)CC2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.56

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.54
PDE10A Q9Y233 5/20 0.49
GAA P10253 1/20 0.48
HCRTR1 O43613 1/20 0.46
HCRTR2 O43614 1/20 0.46
CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.46
CNR2 P34972 1/20 0.46
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.44
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.44
PDE4B Q07343 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6456996 1.00 L3MBTL1 (0.54) L3MBTL1PDE10AGAAHCRTR1HCRTR2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6462261 0.99 L3MBTL1 (0.53) L3MBTL1PDE10AGAAHCRTR1HCRTR2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6462265 0.99 L3MBTL1 (0.53) L3MBTL1PDE10AGAAHCRTR1HCRTR2
SCHEMBL6465820 0.93 PDE10A (0.49) L3MBTL1PDE10ACNR1CNR2PDE4B
SCHEMBL6465823 0.93 PDE10A (0.49) L3MBTL1PDE10ACNR1CNR2PDE4B
SCHEMBL6459182 0.93 PDE10A (0.50) PDE10ACNR1CNR2
SCHEMBL6459172 0.93 PDE10A (0.50) PDE10ACNR1CNR2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6460036 0.92 PDE10A (0.49) L3MBTL1PDE10ACNR1CNR2PDE4B
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6460028 0.92 PDE10A (0.49) L3MBTL1PDE10ACNR1CNR2PDE4B
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6462617 0.92 PDE10A (0.49) PDE10ACNR1CNR2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2005-09-08 US claimed
EP-1464335-A2 Quinoline, tetrahydroquinoline and pyrimidine derivatives as mch antagonist Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (JP) 2004-10-06 EP claimed
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2005-09-08 US disclosed
WO-2004087669-A1 NOVEL QUINOLINE, TETRAHYDROQUINAZOLINE, AND PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF TREATMENT RELATED TO THE USE THEREOF TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD. (JP) 2004-10-14 WO disclosed
EP-1464335-A2 Quinoline, tetrahydroquinoline and pyrimidine derivatives as mch antagonist Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (JP) 2004-10-06 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof HCRTR2, MCHR1, MCHR2 L3MBTL1 3949/4885PDE10A 1335/4885GAA 484/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.