SCHEMBL6459485

SCHEMBL6459485

COc1ccc(C(=O)NC2CCC(Nc3nccc(N(C)C)n3)CC2)cc1OCc1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SMPD1 P17405 3/20 0.52
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.52
HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.52
HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.52
MCHR1 Q99705 10/20 0.50
BRD4 O60885 2/20 0.49
CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.47
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.47
AURKB Q96GD4 1/20 0.47
ADRA2A P08913 3/20 0.46
HRH1 P35367 2/20 0.46
HTR2B P41595 2/20 0.46
ADRA1A P35348 1/20 0.45
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.44
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6459478 1.00 SMPD1 (0.52) SMPD1HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6MCHR1
SCHEMBL6875097 0.90 MCHR1 (0.57) MCHR1CNR1KCNH2AURKBADRA2A
SCHEMBL6875110 0.90 MCHR1 (0.57) MCHR1CNR1KCNH2AURKBADRA2A
SCHEMBL6876181 0.85 SIGMAR1 (0.50) ALDH1A1LMNA
SCHEMBL6876176 0.85 SIGMAR1 (0.50) ALDH1A1LMNA
SCHEMBL13793423 0.84 MCHR1 (0.68) SMPD1HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6MCHR1
SCHEMBL6874831 0.82 CNR1 (0.56) MCHR1CNR1KCNH2AURKBADRA2A
SCHEMBL6874840 0.82 CNR1 (0.56) MCHR1CNR1KCNH2AURKBADRA2A
SCHEMBL6461930 0.82 MCHR1 (0.50) SMPD1HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6MCHR1
SCHEMBL6458814 0.82 MCHR1 (0.50) SMPD1HDAC1HDAC8HDAC6MCHR1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2005-09-08 US claimed
WO-2004087669-A1 NOVEL QUINOLINE, TETRAHYDROQUINAZOLINE, AND PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF TREATMENT RELATED TO THE USE THEREOF TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD. (JP) 2004-10-14 WO claimed
EP-1464335-A2 Quinoline, tetrahydroquinoline and pyrimidine derivatives as mch antagonist Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (JP) 2004-10-06 EP claimed
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2005-09-08 US disclosed
WO-2004087669-A1 NOVEL QUINOLINE, TETRAHYDROQUINAZOLINE, AND PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF TREATMENT RELATED TO THE USE THEREOF TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD. (JP) 2004-10-14 WO disclosed
EP-1464335-A2 Quinoline, tetrahydroquinoline and pyrimidine derivatives as mch antagonist Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (JP) 2004-10-06 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof HCRTR2, MCHR1, MCHR2 SMPD1 2258/4885HDAC1 3559/4885HDAC8 4616/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.