SCHEMBL6464046

SCHEMBL6464046

Cc1cc(C)c(NC(=O)NC[C@H]2CC[C@@H](Nc3cc(N(C)C)c4ccccc4n3)CC2)c(C)c1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MCHR1 Q99705 6/20 0.42
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.42
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.42
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.42
NPY5R Q15761 3/20 0.40
ADRA2A P08913 3/20 0.40
CRHR1 P34998 2/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.38
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.38
PYGL P06737 3/20 0.38
PDE10A Q9Y233 1/20 0.37
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.37
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.37
LCK P06239 2/20 0.37
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.37
ADRA1A P35348 1/20 0.37
HRH1 P35367 1/20 0.37
HTR2B P41595 1/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6464055 1.00 MCHR1 (0.42) MCHR1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNANPY5R
SCHEMBL6875428 0.94 MCHR1 (0.43) MCHR1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNANPY5R
SCHEMBL6875436 0.94 MCHR1 (0.43) MCHR1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNANPY5R
SCHEMBL6463399 0.93 MCHR1 (0.44) MCHR1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNANPY5R
SCHEMBL6463392 0.93 MCHR1 (0.44) MCHR1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNANPY5R
SCHEMBL6874935 0.89 NPY5R (0.43) MCHR1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNANPY5R
SCHEMBL6867311 0.89 KDM4E (0.43) MCHR1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNANPY5R
SCHEMBL6874942 0.89 NPY5R (0.43) MCHR1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNANPY5R
SCHEMBL6867313 0.89 KDM4E (0.43) MCHR1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNANPY5R
SCHEMBL6464423 0.88 MCHR1 (0.40) MCHR1SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNANPY5R

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2005-09-08 US claimed
EP-1464335-A2 Quinoline, tetrahydroquinoline and pyrimidine derivatives as mch antagonist Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (JP) 2004-10-06 EP claimed
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2005-09-08 US disclosed
WO-2004087669-A1 NOVEL QUINOLINE, TETRAHYDROQUINAZOLINE, AND PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF TREATMENT RELATED TO THE USE THEREOF TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD. (JP) 2004-10-14 WO disclosed
EP-1464335-A2 Quinoline, tetrahydroquinoline and pyrimidine derivatives as mch antagonist Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (JP) 2004-10-06 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof HCRTR2, MCHR1, MCHR2 MCHR1 2/4885SMN1; SMN2 1477/4885KDM4E 1190/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.