SCHEMBL650166

SCHEMBL650166

N#Cc1ccc2c(c1)C[C@H](NS(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1)CN2Cc1ccccn1

nearest known ligand 0.69

Predicted protein targets (top 3)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
FNTA P49354 17/20 0.69
FNTB P49356 17/20 0.69
THRB P10828 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL651690 1.00 FNTA (0.69) FNTAFNTBTHRB
SCHEMBL7246580 0.88 FNTA (0.68) FNTAFNTBTHRB
SCHEMBL648851 0.88 FNTA (0.71) FNTAFNTBTHRB
SCHEMBL648852 0.88 FNTA (0.71) FNTAFNTBTHRB
SCHEMBL653554 0.88 FNTA (0.71) FNTAFNTBTHRB
SCHEMBL651287 0.87 FNTA (0.71) FNTAFNTBTHRB
SCHEMBL651288 0.87 FNTA (0.71) FNTAFNTBTHRB
SCHEMBL650468 0.85 FNTA (0.71) FNTAFNTBTHRB
SCHEMBL650467 0.85 FNTA (0.71) FNTAFNTBTHRB
SCHEMBL651452 0.84 FNTA (0.67) FNTAFNTBTHRB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7884113-B2 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as cannabinoid receptor modulators BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY (US) 2011-02-08 US claimed
US-20080194625-A1 TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CANNABINOID RECEPTOR MODULATORS BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY 2008-08-14 US claimed
US-20050014786-A1 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as cannabinoid receptor modulators BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY 2005-01-20 US claimed
US-8119808-B2 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as cannabinoid receptor modulators BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY (US) 2012-02-21 US disclosed
US-20110104315-A1 TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CANNABINOID RECEPTOR MODULATORS BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY 2011-05-05 US disclosed
US-7884113-B2 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as cannabinoid receptor modulators BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY (US) 2011-02-08 US disclosed
US-20080194625-A1 TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CANNABINOID RECEPTOR MODULATORS BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY 2008-08-14 US disclosed
US-20050014786-A1 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as cannabinoid receptor modulators BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY 2005-01-20 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110104315-A1 TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CANNABINOID RECEPTOR MODULATORS CNR2, CNR1, OPRL1 FNTA 1368/4885FNTB 2071/4885THRB 809/4885
US-20050014786-A1 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as cannabinoid receptor modulators CNR2, CNR1, OPRL1 FNTA 1368/4885FNTB 2071/4885THRB 809/4885
US-20080194625-A1 TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CANNABINOID RECEPTOR MODULATORS CNR2, CNR1, OPRL1 FNTA 1368/4885FNTB 2071/4885THRB 809/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.