SCHEMBL6791392

SCHEMBL6791392

CN1CCc2c(N)cc3[nH]c(=O)c(=O)[nH]c3c2C1

nearest known ligand 1.00 ✓ in ChEMBL — recovers established targets

Predicted protein targets (top 4)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GRIA1 P42261 7/20 0.64
GRIA2 P42262 7/20 0.64
GRIA3 P42263 7/20 0.64
GRIA4 P48058 7/20 0.64

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6783780 0.83 GRIA1 (0.66) GRIA1GRIA2GRIA3GRIA4
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6784471 0.82 GRIA1 (0.65) GRIA1GRIA2GRIA3GRIA4
SCHEMBL6783546 0.82 GRIA1 (0.63) GRIA1GRIA2GRIA3GRIA4
SCHEMBL6785532 0.81 GRIA1 (0.67) GRIA1GRIA2GRIA3GRIA4
SCHEMBL6785960 0.81 GRIA1 (0.59) GRIA1GRIA2GRIA3GRIA4
SCHEMBL8808895 0.81 GRIA1 (0.66) GRIA1GRIA2GRIA3GRIA4
SCHEMBL6786031 0.80 GRIA1 (0.64) GRIA1GRIA2GRIA3GRIA4
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6784540 0.80 GRIA1 (0.64) GRIA1GRIA2GRIA3GRIA4
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL8813106 0.79 GRIA1 (0.63) GRIA1GRIA2GRIA3GRIA4
SCHEMBL6783161 0.79 GRIA1 (0.63) GRIA1GRIA2GRIA3GRIA4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20030114422-A1 NOVEL QUINOXALINEDIONE DERIVATIVES, THEIR PREPARATION AND USE NEUROSEARCH A/S (DK) 2003-06-19 US claimed
EP-0664807-B1 QUINOXALINEDIONE DERIVATIVES AS EAA ANTAGONISTS WARNER LAMBERT CO (US) 1997-09-10 EP claimed
EP-0664807-A1 QUINOXALINEDIONE DERIVATIVES AS EAA ANTAGONISTS. WARNER LAMBERT CO (US) 1995-08-02 EP claimed
WO-1994009000-A1 QUINOXALINEDIONE DERIVATIVES AS EAA ANTAGONISTS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 1994-04-28 WO claimed
US-6703391-B2 THROMBOSIS, BRAIN DISORDERS, CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, HUNTINGTON DISEASES NEUROSEARCH A/S (DK) 2004-03-09 US disclosed
EP-0664807-B1 QUINOXALINEDIONE DERIVATIVES AS EAA ANTAGONISTS WARNER LAMBERT CO (US) 1997-09-10 EP disclosed
EP-0664807-A1 QUINOXALINEDIONE DERIVATIVES AS EAA ANTAGONISTS. WARNER LAMBERT CO (US) 1995-08-02 EP disclosed
WO-1994009000-A1 QUINOXALINEDIONE DERIVATIVES AS EAA ANTAGONISTS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 1994-04-28 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030114422-A1 NOVEL QUINOXALINEDIONE DERIVATIVES, THEIR PREPARATION AND USE CHRNA3, CHRNA7, CHRNB3 GRIA1 41/4885GRIA2 25/4885GRIA3 16/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.