SCHEMBL737096

SCHEMBL737096

Cc1ccc(S(=O)(=O)O)cc1.Nc1ccc(OC2CCN(C3CCC3)CC2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.54

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ABL1BMXBRAFBTKCHRNA4CHRNB2CSNK1EEGFRERBB2F10FLT1FLT3FLT4IGF1RINSRITKJAK3KDRKITOPRM1PARP1PARP2PDGFRBPIK3CDRAF1RETSLC18A2TECTXKdacAdacBdacCftsImrcAmrcBmrdArplArplBrplCrplDrplErplFrplJrplKrplLrplMrplNrplOrplPrplQrplRrplSrplTrplUrplVrplWrplXrplYrpmArpmBrpmCrpmDrpmErpmFrpmGrpmHrpmIrpmJrpsArpsBrpsCrpsDrpsErpsFrpsGrpsHrpsIrpsJrpsKrpsLrpsMrpsNrpsOrpsPrpsQrpsRrpsSrpsTrpsUykgMykgO

The experimentally established mechanism targets of None. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 5)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HRH1 P35367 5/20 0.54
CCR3 P51677 4/20 0.54
HRH3 Q9Y5N1 15/20 0.52
KCNH2 Q12809 2/20 0.49
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL16712653 0.83 HRH3 (0.61) HRH3KCNH2
SCHEMBL737639 0.82 HRH3 (0.63) HRH3KCNH2
SCHEMBL4464014 0.79 HRH3 (0.68) HRH3KCNH2
SCHEMBL737097 0.79 HRH1 (0.52) HRH1CCR3HRH3KCNH2
SCHEMBL17533980 0.78 HRH3 (0.58) HRH3KCNH2
SCHEMBL4468194 0.76 HRH3 (0.58) HRH3KCNH2
SCHEMBL28966903 0.75 CYP2D6 (0.63) HRH1CCR3HRH3KCNH2CYP2D6
SCHEMBL11782818 0.73 TSHR (0.78) CYP2D6
SCHEMBL11821857 0.73 TSHR (0.78) CYP2D6
SCHEMBL8421197 0.73 TSHR (0.78) CYP2D6

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090306375-A1 Process for production of 4(3H)-quinazolinone derivative MSD K.K. (JP) 2009-12-10 US claimed
US-8138206-B2 Piperidine derivative MSD. K.K. (JP) 2012-03-20 US disclosed
US-20090306375-A1 Process for production of 4(3H)-quinazolinone derivative MSD K.K. (JP) 2009-12-10 US disclosed
US-20090137576-A1 Novel Piperidine Derivative MSD K.K. (JP) 2009-05-28 US disclosed
EP-1900733-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF 4(3H)-QUINAZOLINONE DERIVATIVE BANYU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) 2008-03-19 EP disclosed
EP-1892241-A1 NOVEL PIPERIDINE DERIVATIVE BANYU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) 2008-02-27 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090137576-A1 Novel Piperidine Derivative HRH4, HRH3, HRH1 HRH1 3/4885CCR3 455/4885HRH3 2/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.